Re: [Evolution-hackers] Anyone doing nightly builds for SUSE?

2010-01-29 Thread John Lange
On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 22:50 -0500, Suman Manjunath wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 09:16 -0600, John Lange wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 15:50 +0530, Bharath Acharya wrote:
> > 
> > > The nightly builds were broken because of some IMAPX issues. They
> > are up
> > > now, but would be updated every week, no nightly builds.
> > > 
> > > The nightly builds now have 2.29.6+ running.
> > 
> > Thanks. I gave it a quick try and it complains that "Nothing provides
> > libgtkimageview.so.0 64 bit". Just thought I'd let you know.
> 
> Make sure libgtkimageview0 is installed on your machine. Run: 
> 
> $ rpm -qa | grep libgtkimageview 
> 
> If it is installed, run /sbin/ldconfig as root. You should no longer see
> that issue. If it is not, install libgtkimageview: 
> 
> $ zypper in -y libgtkimageview0 
> 
> and evolution should no longer complain. 

Thanks. I'm familiar with installing packages but I was just pointing
out that the "one-click" isn't working for the weekly evolution builds.

Even though there is something that provides libgtkimageview, it isn't
working since I believe it's actually called "libgtkimageview0".

> zypper search libgtkimageview

S | Name  | ...
--+---+ ...
  | libgtkimageview-devel | Libraries for GtkImageView ...
  | libgtkimageview0  | GtkImageView widget - files ...

(truncated to avoid wrapping)

I'll try it again after the next build.

Regards,

-- 
John Lange
http://www.johnlange.ca

___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers


Re: [Evolution-hackers] Anyone doing nightly builds for SUSE?

2010-01-28 Thread Suman Manjunath
On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 09:16 -0600, John Lange wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 15:50 +0530, Bharath Acharya wrote:
> 
> > The nightly builds were broken because of some IMAPX issues. They
> are up
> > now, but would be updated every week, no nightly builds.
> > 
> > The nightly builds now have 2.29.6+ running.
> 
> Thanks. I gave it a quick try and it complains that "Nothing provides
> libgtkimageview.so.0 64 bit". Just thought I'd let you know.

Make sure libgtkimageview0 is installed on your machine. Run: 

$ rpm -qa | grep libgtkimageview 

If it is installed, run /sbin/ldconfig as root. You should no longer see
that issue. If it is not, install libgtkimageview: 

$ zypper in -y libgtkimageview0 

and evolution should no longer complain. 

-Suman

___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers


Re: [Evolution-hackers] Anyone doing nightly builds for SUSE?

2010-01-28 Thread Bharath Acharya
On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 09:16 -0600, John Lange wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 15:50 +0530, Bharath Acharya wrote:
> 
> > The nightly builds were broken because of some IMAPX issues. They are up
> > now, but would be updated every week, no nightly builds.
> > 
> > The nightly builds now have 2.29.6+ running.
> 
> Thanks. I gave it a quick try and it complains that "Nothing provides
> libgtkimageview.so.0 64 bit". Just thought I'd let you know.

Sure thanks for keeping me informed. Try installing the library from
http://software.opensuse.org/search and see if that helps. Anyways I'll
fix the builds within a day and test them on a fresh build.

Regards,
--Bharath

> 
> Regards,
> 


___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers


Re: [Evolution-hackers] Anyone doing nightly builds for SUSE?

2010-01-28 Thread John Lange
On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 15:50 +0530, Bharath Acharya wrote:

> The nightly builds were broken because of some IMAPX issues. They are up
> now, but would be updated every week, no nightly builds.
> 
> The nightly builds now have 2.29.6+ running.

Thanks. I gave it a quick try and it complains that "Nothing provides
libgtkimageview.so.0 64 bit". Just thought I'd let you know.

Regards,

-- 
John Lange
http://www.johnlange.ca

___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers


Re: [Evolution-hackers] Anyone doing nightly builds for SUSE?

2010-01-28 Thread Bharath Acharya
Hello,

On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 12:05 -0600, John Lange wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 17:05 +, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 10:19 -0600, John Lange wrote:
> > > I'm looking to get Evolution 2.29.6 for testing a bug fix:
> > > 
> > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=603715
> > > 
> > > What would be the least risky way to do this?
> > > 
> > > Sorry, I realize this is a pretty basic question for a "hackers" list.
> > 
> > The usual answer is either wait for your distro to package it or, if
> > you're familiar with the basics of git and building software from source
> > code, you can try building it yourself with jhbuild [1].
> 
> Fair enough. Just thought as the bug reporter I should make an effort to
> try and test the fix. I've tried to build evolution from source in the
> past and it didn't go well and I'm probably not the only bug reporter in
> this situation.

The nightly builds were broken because of some IMAPX issues. They are up
now, but would be updated every week, no nightly builds.

The nightly builds now have 2.29.6+ running.

Regards,
--Bharath
> 
> Regards,
> 


___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers


Re: [Evolution-hackers] Anyone doing nightly builds for SUSE?

2010-01-26 Thread John Lange
On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 17:05 +, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 10:19 -0600, John Lange wrote:
> > I'm looking to get Evolution 2.29.6 for testing a bug fix:
> > 
> > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=603715
> > 
> > What would be the least risky way to do this?
> > 
> > Sorry, I realize this is a pretty basic question for a "hackers" list.
> 
> The usual answer is either wait for your distro to package it or, if
> you're familiar with the basics of git and building software from source
> code, you can try building it yourself with jhbuild [1].

Fair enough. Just thought as the bug reporter I should make an effort to
try and test the fix. I've tried to build evolution from source in the
past and it didn't go well and I'm probably not the only bug reporter in
this situation.

Regards,

-- 
John Lange
http://www.johnlange.ca

___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers


Re: [Evolution-hackers] Anyone doing nightly builds for SUSE?

2010-01-26 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 10:19 -0600, John Lange wrote:
> I'm looking to get Evolution 2.29.6 for testing a bug fix:
> 
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=603715
> 
> What would be the least risky way to do this?
> 
> Sorry, I realize this is a pretty basic question for a "hackers" list.

The usual answer is either wait for your distro to package it or, if
you're familiar with the basics of git and building software from source
code, you can try building it yourself with jhbuild [1].

If you're not too tied to a particular distro or you have virtualization
software, Fedora's devel repository (aka. "Rawhide") has it already.

Matthew Barnes


[1] http://live.gnome.org/Jhbuild

___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers


Re: [Evolution-hackers] Anyone doing nightly builds for SUSE?

2010-01-26 Thread John Lange
On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 19:14 -0800, Suman Manjunath wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 17:00 -0500, Suman Manjunath wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 15:17 -0600, John Lange wrote:
> > > Just curious if anyone is doing nightly (or frequent) package builds for
> > > SUSE (11.2)?
> > 
> > http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/GNOME://Evolution://snapshots/openSUSE_11.2/
> > 
> > > I'd like to test some of the new features and bug fixes but in the past,
> > > when I've tried to use packages from openSUSE Factory, it also had
> > > dependencies on newer versions of the entire gnome stack which was a big
> > > headache.
> > 
> > The above repository was meant to host daily snapshots of the vanilla
> > code. Right now though, it is picking up code from the 2.28 branch. I'll
> > try to get it to compile the 2.29 series over the holidays. 
> 
> The snapshots repository is now building git master. It may take a while
> before all the mirrors show the updates. 
> 
> Also the MAPI repository:
> http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/GNOME://Evolution://mapi/ 
> 
> is building Samba 4 alpha 10, (soon to be) libmapi 0.9 and
> evolution-mapi 0.29.3. However, evolution-mapi 0.29.3 is not available
> for the 11.2 repository without the snapshots (evolution-mapi has a
> dependency on e-d-s 2.29.1)
> 
> > HTH
> > 
> > -Suman
> > 

I'm looking to get Evolution 2.29.6 for testing a bug fix:

https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=603715

What would be the least risky way to do this?

Sorry, I realize this is a pretty basic question for a "hackers" list.

-- 
John Lange
http://www.johnlange.ca

___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers


Re: [Evolution-hackers] Anyone doing nightly builds for SUSE?

2009-12-15 Thread Suman Manjunath
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 17:00 -0500, Suman Manjunath wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 15:17 -0600, John Lange wrote:
> > Just curious if anyone is doing nightly (or frequent) package builds for
> > SUSE (11.2)?
> 
> http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/GNOME://Evolution://snapshots/openSUSE_11.2/
> 
> > I'd like to test some of the new features and bug fixes but in the past,
> > when I've tried to use packages from openSUSE Factory, it also had
> > dependencies on newer versions of the entire gnome stack which was a big
> > headache.
> 
> The above repository was meant to host daily snapshots of the vanilla
> code. Right now though, it is picking up code from the 2.28 branch. I'll
> try to get it to compile the 2.29 series over the holidays. 

The snapshots repository is now building git master. It may take a while
before all the mirrors show the updates. 

Also the MAPI repository:
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/GNOME://Evolution://mapi/ 

is building Samba 4 alpha 10, (soon to be) libmapi 0.9 and
evolution-mapi 0.29.3. However, evolution-mapi 0.29.3 is not available
for the 11.2 repository without the snapshots (evolution-mapi has a
dependency on e-d-s 2.29.1)

> HTH
> 
> -Suman
> 


___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers


Re: [Evolution-hackers] Anyone doing nightly builds for SUSE?

2009-12-04 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 15:17 -0600, John Lange wrote:
> I'd like to test some of the new features and bug fixes but in the
> past, when I've tried to use packages from openSUSE Factory, it also had
> dependencies on newer versions of the entire gnome stack which was a big
> headache.

Just a quick note about this:

Our dependency policy is that Evolution must always be buildable on the
latest stable GNOME release, which is currently 2.28.  If you're running
a GNOME 2.28 desktop then you should be fine.  The rationale there is to
avoid forcing users to upgrade to a bleeding edge desktop just to test a
bleeding edge Evolution.

On the other hand, any new technology in GNOME 2.28 is fair game for
Evolution 2.29.  The rationale there is to make it crystal clear to
developers what APIs they can and can't use, and to try to keep
Evolution from falling too far behind the technology curve.

I think it strikes a good balance, personally.

Matthew Barnes

___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers


Re: [Evolution-hackers] Anyone doing nightly builds for SUSE?

2009-12-04 Thread Paul Smith
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 17:00 -0500, Suman Manjunath wrote:
> > Barring that, what would be the best way to test the current unstable
> > release of Evolution? Should I just compile it from source and run it
> > from my home directory? Again, I fear the list of "dev" package
> > dependencies.
> 
> AFAIK, you only have to install the -devel packages of all the deps.
> Shouldn't be harder than having to compile it :-) 
> Also, the GNOME:Factory repo is updated with every unstable GNOME
> release. You may want to try that as well.

I just want to point out that it's not always that easy.  There are
major changes in some releases (such as 2.29) which require a lot more
effort.  For 2.29, you'll have to install new schemas, etc. for example.
Also, replacing basic versions of libraries like libgstreamer,
libgtkimageview, etc. on your system can prove problematic for other
applications that are expecting the older versions.

Evo 2.30 is shaping up to have many more fundamental differences than
most previous versions.

It's probably simpler to use prebuilt packages than rolling your own (I
have a makefile that will build these packages on your system and
install them into a separate location so they won't interfere with your
existing system.  However, today I discovered a problem where it's not
correctly configuring d-bus so that needs a little love before it's
ready for general use.

Also, it's currently targeted at Ubuntu/Debian, since that's what I use;
it could still be used with RPM-based distros but might require some
help.

___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers


Re: [Evolution-hackers] Anyone doing nightly builds for SUSE?

2009-12-04 Thread Suman Manjunath
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 15:17 -0600, John Lange wrote:
> Just curious if anyone is doing nightly (or frequent) package builds for
> SUSE (11.2)?

http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/GNOME://Evolution://snapshots/openSUSE_11.2/

> I'd like to test some of the new features and bug fixes but in the past,
> when I've tried to use packages from openSUSE Factory, it also had
> dependencies on newer versions of the entire gnome stack which was a big
> headache.

The above repository was meant to host daily snapshots of the vanilla
code. Right now though, it is picking up code from the 2.28 branch. I'll
try to get it to compile the 2.29 series over the holidays. 

> Barring that, what would be the best way to test the current unstable
> release of Evolution? Should I just compile it from source and run it
> from my home directory? Again, I fear the list of "dev" package
> dependencies.

AFAIK, you only have to install the -devel packages of all the deps.
Shouldn't be harder than having to compile it :-) 
Also, the GNOME:Factory repo is updated with every unstable GNOME
release. You may want to try that as well. 

HTH

-Suman

___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers


[Evolution-hackers] Anyone doing nightly builds for SUSE?

2009-12-04 Thread John Lange
Just curious if anyone is doing nightly (or frequent) package builds for
SUSE (11.2)?

I'd like to test some of the new features and bug fixes but in the past,
when I've tried to use packages from openSUSE Factory, it also had
dependencies on newer versions of the entire gnome stack which was a big
headache.

Barring that, what would be the best way to test the current unstable
release of Evolution? Should I just compile it from source and run it
from my home directory? Again, I fear the list of "dev" package
dependencies.

Regards,

-- 
John Lange
http://www.johnlange.ca

___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers