Re: [Evolution-hackers] GnomeDruid migration

2009-01-10 Thread Andre Klapper
Am Donnerstag, den 10.05.2007, 11:05 +0200 schrieb Gilles Dartiguelongue: I looked at the sources to get a feel of how easy it would be to migrate from GnomeDruid to GtkAssistant. I've now filed http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=567260 about porting from GnomeDruid to GtkAssistent.

[Evolution-hackers] GnomeDruid migration

2007-05-10 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Hi list, I looked at the sources to get a feel of how easy it would be to migrate from GnomeDruid to GtkAssistant. I started some work on the startup config plugin and on the new mail account glade part. At that point, trying to create a new account just crashes evolution, so I decide to look

Re: [Evolution-hackers] GnomeDruid migration

2007-05-10 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
Gillies, On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 11:05 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: Hi list, I looked at the sources to get a feel of how easy it would be to migrate from GnomeDruid to GtkAssistant. I started some work on the startup config plugin and on the new mail account glade part. At that point,

Re: [Evolution-hackers] GnomeDruid migration

2007-05-10 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le jeudi 10 mai 2007 à 15:40 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit : So, what should be done here, indefinitely keep the current implementation or get rid of one more part of libgnomeui and simplifying evo's implementation ? I would prefer to move to GtkAssistant but then it should still

Re: [Evolution-hackers] GnomeDruid migration

2007-05-10 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 11:05 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: I found that currently wizards are intricated with notebooks in e-utils/e-config.c. Although it worked relatively well with GnomeDruid, I tried to adapt it to GtkAssistant without much success. It seems there is no easy way to get

Re: [Evolution-hackers] GnomeDruid migration

2007-05-10 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 16:07 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: Le jeudi 10 mai 2007 à 15:40 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit : So, what should be done here, indefinitely keep the current implementation or get rid of one more part of libgnomeui and simplifying evo's implementation ?