Re: [Evolution-hackers] WebKit based Evolution composer status and future

2014-06-10 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 16:57 +0200, Tomas Popela wrote: Hi, the WebKit based composer was commited into master with [0]. Awesome! Congrats on landing that - that's a pretty major feature and I'll start testing it immediately. Also I have to say I'm thrilled to finally see GtkHTML die for

Re: [Evolution-hackers] WebKit based Evolution composer status and future

2014-06-09 Thread Tomas Popela
Hi, the WebKit based composer was commited into master with [0]. Tomas [0] - https://git.gnome.org/browse/evolution/commit/?id=8650fb139a9143f04615de74ff569bce3e0c4ce3 On Po, 2014-03-17 at 09:25 +0100, Tomas Popela wrote: Hi Evolution hackers, as some of you probably know, I'm continuing

Re: [Evolution-hackers] WebKit based Evolution composer status and future

2014-05-30 Thread Tomas Popela
Hi everyone, after talk with Milan we decided to merge webkit-composer branch into master on Monday, June 9, 2014. Best regards Tomas On Po, 2014-03-17 at 09:25 +0100, Tomas Popela wrote: Hi Evolution hackers, as some of you probably know, I'm continuing with work on new Evolution composer

Re: [Evolution-hackers] WebKit based Evolution composer status and future

2014-05-30 Thread Emre Erenoglu
On May 30, 2014 9:28 AM, Tomas Popela tpop...@redhat.com wrote: Hi everyone, after talk with Milan we decided to merge webkit-composer branch into master on Monday, June 9, 2014. Great news! Thanks guys for all the work you've been doing! I'll compile it first thing on Monday :)

Re: [Evolution-hackers] WebKit based Evolution composer status and future

2014-05-30 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
On Fri, 2014-05-30 at 08:28 +0200, Tomas Popela wrote: Hi everyone, after talk with Milan we decided to merge webkit-composer branch into master on Monday, June 9, 2014. Woo Hooo! I guess it is time to remember how to build Evo. On Po, 2014-03-17 at 09:25 +0100, Tomas Popela wrote: What

Re: [Evolution-hackers] WebKit based Evolution composer status and future

2014-05-20 Thread Milan Crha
On Tue, 2014-05-20 at 16:34 +0400, Emre Erenoglu wrote: ping... Hi, do not be afraid, it is not forgotten, there was only involved some other work which interrupted the webkit-composer work. It's mostly over now and the expected development version with the webkit composer branch merged

Re: [Evolution-hackers] WebKit based Evolution composer status and future

2014-05-20 Thread Emre Erenoglu
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 6:27 PM, Milan Crha mc...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, 2014-05-20 at 16:34 +0400, Emre Erenoglu wrote: ping... Hi, do not be afraid, it is not forgotten, there was only involved some other work which interrupted the webkit-composer work. It's mostly over now

Re: [Evolution-hackers] WebKit based Evolution composer status and future

2014-03-30 Thread Emre Erenoglu
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 12:21 AM, Matthew Barnes mbar...@redhat.com wrote: The next release following 3.12 will happen in March, 2015. So we have an entire year to stabilize the WebKit composer. Also the HTML library that the composer is currently based on has been dead several years now,

[Evolution-hackers] WebKit based Evolution composer status and future

2014-03-17 Thread Tomas Popela
Hi Evolution hackers, as some of you probably know, I'm continuing with work on new Evolution composer based on WebKit (WebKit1) and I want to share with you the current status and the future of new composer. Right now, the composer takes place in wip/webkit-composer branch in Evolution git

Re: [Evolution-hackers] WebKit based Evolution composer status and future

2014-03-17 Thread Emre Erenoglu
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Tomas Popela tpop...@redhat.com wrote: Hi Evolution hackers, as some of you probably know, I'm continuing with work on new Evolution composer based on WebKit (WebKit1) and I want to share with you the current status and the future of new composer. Hi Tomas,

Re: [Evolution-hackers] WebKit based Evolution composer status and future

2014-03-17 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Mon, 2014-03-17 at 20:05 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: While I have no say in how Evolution gets developed, I nonetheless would like to warn against merging unstable and known buggy code into master. What if it turns out that the code can't be stabilized in time for the next release? Can it be