[Evolution-hackers] Memory usage of CamelFolderSummary and CamelImapFolder

2006-11-16 Thread Philip Van Hoof
I did another round of checking where the memory of Camel is going to in tinymail's Camel. I have also tested its Camel with Evolution with success. Tinymail's Camel has the following features: o. The CamelFolderSummary uses mmap. This significantly reduces memory usage because an mmap

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Memory usage of CamelFolderSummary and CamelImapFolder

2006-11-16 Thread Philip Van Hoof
On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 16:13 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote: I did another round of checking where the memory of Camel is going to in tinymail's Camel. I have also tested its Camel with Evolution with success. Tinymail's Camel has the following features: Next to these features, tinymail's

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Memory usage of CamelFolderSummary and CamelImapFolder

2006-11-16 Thread Philip Van Hoof
On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 11:41 -0500, Joe Shaw wrote: Hey Joe, On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 16:13 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote: o. The CamelFolderSummary uses mmap. This significantly reduces memory usage because an mmap is on-demand paged. Does the on-disk format of the CamelFolderSummary