Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evo and Kolab2 - a fresh attempt

2010-07-07 Thread Christian Hilberg
Hi Michael, On Wednesday 26 May 2010 at 12:18:04 Michael Meeks wrote: Hi Christian, [...] It'd be better really to develop vs. master - from a support, testing, future-proofing, and ease-of-use perspective. Presumably it is possible to get you commit access to the repository so you

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evo and Kolab2 - a fresh attempt

2010-06-07 Thread Christian Hilberg
Hi there, while the project setup process is going on, I've had a look again at suitable testframeworks. Unfortunately, many unit test frameworks for the C language appear to be abandoned. On Wednesday 26 May 2010 at 12:18:04 you wrote: Hi Christian, On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 11:15 +0200,

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evo and Kolab2 - a fresh attempt

2010-06-07 Thread Philip Withnall
Hi, On Mon, 2010-06-07 at 17:31 +0200, Christian Hilberg wrote: Hi there, while the project setup process is going on, I've had a look again at suitable testframeworks. Unfortunately, many unit test frameworks for the C language appear to be abandoned. On Wednesday 26 May 2010 at

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evo and Kolab2 - a fresh attempt

2010-05-26 Thread chen
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 11:18 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: Hi Christian, On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 11:15 +0200, Christian Hilberg wrote: This sounds pretty cool and would be a welcome addition to the Evolution suite. Agreed. We'll check that out with other Gnome projects. It may