Re: [Evolution-hackers] Future of eds bindings

2008-08-19 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Sun, 2008-08-17 at 19:30 +0100, Ross Burton wrote: On Sun, 2008-08-17 at 20:18 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: Do you plan to do that before replacing Bonobo in the mainline Evolution? Yes, finding out why getchanges() is so damn slow is on the list of things to do. I'm afraid speeding up

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Future of eds bindings

2008-08-17 Thread Ross Burton
On Sun, 2008-08-17 at 20:18 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: Do you plan to do that before replacing Bonobo in the mainline Evolution? Yes, finding out why getchanges() is so damn slow is on the list of things to do. Ross -- Ross Burton mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Future of eds bindings

2008-08-15 Thread Ross Burton
On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 12:59 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I may be wrong, but that is actually a port of EDS to use dbus, e.g. the user of the evolution data server, be it eds-dbus uses the same C API as eds-orbit. I'm actually talking more about doing a DBUS interface to the client C api,

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Future of eds bindings

2008-08-15 Thread Andre Klapper
Am Freitag, den 15.08.2008, 11:17 +0100 schrieb Ross Burton: On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 12:09 +0200, Muelli wrote: a DBUS interface to the e-d-s That has already been done: http://labs.o-hand.com/embedded-eds/ It's actually faster than EDS-ORBit. Do we have stats, and also tests with

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Future of eds bindings

2008-08-15 Thread Ross Burton
On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 13:40 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: Am Freitag, den 15.08.2008, 11:17 +0100 schrieb Ross Burton: On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 12:09 +0200, Muelli wrote: a DBUS interface to the e-d-s That has already been done: http://labs.o-hand.com/embedded-eds/ It's actually faster