Please take a look at the new and reworked patch for adding
bodystructure retrieval and storage support.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=588557#c7
I reworked the patch to make it store using a separate table, as
requested in the comments by Srinivasa.
On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 12:57 +02
Ping, do we have a decision on this?
On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 12:57 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I would like Evolution to store IMAP's bodystructure as often as
> possible. The reason for this is storing RDF graphs. Let me explain.
>
> I wrote a EPlugin for Evolution that is comp
I created a tracking bug for this:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=588557
On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 12:57 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> I would like Evolution to store IMAP's bodystructure as often as
> possible. The reason for this is storing RDF graphs. Let me explain.
>
> I wrote a EP
This new version of the patch fixes memoryleak on mi->bodystructure in
message_info_free and fixes a "version < 1" in camel-db.c
On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 12:57 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I would like Evolution to store IMAP's bodystructure as often as
> possible. The reason for th
