Hi Matthew,
On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 10:00 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
And while we're at it, can we please drop the meaningless -1.2 suffix
from the library names (e.g. libedataserver-1.2.so)? As far as I can
tell this is just an artifact from an age before the EDS sonames were
On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 10:05 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
Even I would have loved this if we can get all the friends to be 2.22.
Unfortunately GtkHTML can't be 2.22 as it is already 3.xx. I felt that
synchronizing the minor versions is fine. I'm not really against it, if
there aren't any
On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 09:57 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
Cue, screaming ... please read:
http://lxr.go-oo.org/source/dba/connectivity/source/drivers/evoab2/EApi.cxx#046
and reconsider ;-) be aware that it takes weeks to months to get that
change up-stream, and months to get a
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 11:31 +, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
There have been many requests regarding syncing the versions of
Evolution (currently 2.12) and GNOME (2.20). I feel that it would be
fine, if we just sync the minor versions.
Evolution 2.22
GtkHTML 3.22
Evolution Data Server
Am Mittwoch, den 03.10.2007, 13:43 +0200 schrieb Jules Colding:
Does it really matter? But, well, I doesn't care so please go ahead...
it does. it's annoying that i have to remember which version corresponds
to which gnome release for gtk+, glib, evofriends and other modules
(i'm happy that atk,
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 11:31 +, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
There have been many requests regarding syncing the versions of
Evolution (currently 2.12) and GNOME (2.20). I feel that it would be
fine, if we just sync the minor versions.
Evolution 2.22
GtkHTML 3.22
Evolution Data Server
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 14:17 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
it does. it's annoying that i have to remember which version
corresponds to which gnome release for gtk+, glib, evofriends and
other modules (i'm happy that atk, at-spi gail already switched to
the gnome versioning a few months back),
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 09:03 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 11:31 +, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
There have been many requests regarding syncing the versions of
Evolution (currently 2.12) and GNOME (2.20). I feel that it would be
fine, if we just sync the minor
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 12:53 +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 11:31 +, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
There have been many requests regarding syncing the versions of
Evolution (currently 2.12) and GNOME (2.20). I feel that it would be
fine, if we just sync the minor versions.
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 16:51 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
Applications that link to E-D-S would have to be recompiled obviously,
but as long as they're using pkgconfig correctly they should not require
any code changes (I think).
I knew this claim would come back to bite me. The pkgconfig
Matthew,
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 16:51 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 12:53 +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 11:31 +, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
There have been many requests regarding syncing the versions of
Evolution (currently 2.12) and GNOME (2.20).
Ross,
Even I would have loved this if we can get all the friends to be 2.22.
Unfortunately GtkHTML can't be 2.22 as it is already 3.xx. I felt that
synchronizing the minor versions is fine. I'm not really against it, if
there aren't any major objections to this.
-Srini.
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at
12 matches
Mail list logo
