On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 22:17 +0800, Not Zed wrote: > How important is it?
Not really that important, more in the line of "If it was designed to be called then it should be called"-issue. Nitpicking i guess. > Exactly what are you requiring it for? Freeing local resources. > If you're using it to free remote resources, like connections, then this > is the wrong place to do it. disconnect() is the place for these types > of resource deallocations. OK, I do that already. > Otherwise, if it is just memory leaks, it just isn't important. It is only due to memory leaks. Regards, jules > On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 12:00 +0200, Jules Colding wrote: > > On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 17:24 +0800, Not Zed wrote: > > > No. > > > > > > Sync could be called at any time. > > > > > > I wasn't aware it was a known issue either, stores certainly used to be > > > finalised at one point. > > > > Is this an issue that will be fixed in the 2.4 branch or has it to low > > of a priority to fix unless there isn't anything else to hack on? > > > > Thanks, > > jules > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 11:24 +0200, Jules Colding wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 03:15 -0600, Susarla Parthasarathi wrote: > > > > > Thats a known issue. A little complicated to fix. But is surely > > > > > fixable. > > > > > > > > > > So, none of the providers have their finalize method called. > > > > > > > > OK, thanks. I can see that the last method being called is sync(). > > > > Could/should I safely call finalize() from that one? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > jules > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Evolution-hackers mailing list > > > > Evolution-hackers@gnome.org > > > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers > > _______________________________________________ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers