Re: [Evolution-hackers] [Tracker] Support in Tracker for ultra-new Evolution installs that use SQLite for the summary format

2008-12-19 Thread Jerry Tan
Hi, philip How about to open folders.db in readonly mode? I just check sqlite's API. sqlite3_open_v2 support a para with readonly flag On 2008ǯ12·î12Æü 00:34, Philip Van Hoof wrote: This patch makes ultra-new Evolution installs work again with Tracker. There's one problem and that is that

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [Tracker] Support in Tracker for ultra-new Evolution installs that use SQLite for the summary format

2008-12-19 Thread Ivan Frade
hi philip, short comment (the tablet is not the best device to review patches): can we call this module "evolution224" and keep also the old module? we could choose between one or other with a flag in compilation time (the distributions will choose the correct for them) regards, Ivan On 12/11

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [Tracker] Support in Tracker for ultra-new Evolution installs that use SQLite for the summary format

2008-12-12 Thread Philip Van Hoof
I just posted a new version of the patch which now opens the DB in read-only mode. Thanks for the suggestion On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 15:12 +0800, Jerry Tan wrote: > Hi, philip > > How about to open folders.db in readonly mode? > > I just check sqlite's API. > sqlite3_open_v2 support a para with

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [Tracker] Support in Tracker for ultra-new Evolution installs that use SQLite for the summary format

2008-12-12 Thread Philip Van Hoof
On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 01:59 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote: > On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 23:58 +0200, Ivan Frade wrote: > > hi philip, > > > > short comment (the tablet is not the best device to review patches): > > can we call this module "evolution224" and keep also the old module? > > we could choose

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [Tracker] Support in Tracker for ultra-new Evolution installs that use SQLite for the summary format

2008-12-11 Thread Philip Van Hoof
On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 23:58 +0200, Ivan Frade wrote: > hi philip, > > short comment (the tablet is not the best device to review patches): > can we call this module "evolution224" and keep also the old module? > we could choose between one or other with a flag in compilation time > (the distribut