Re: [Evolution-hackers] [evolution-patches] Fix for agressive memory segmentation

2006-07-06 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
For some strange reason I thought the pstring stuff already did that, oops. I guess I was thinking of similar code I wrote a few years back for another project... This patch does it the way I had done it in another project of mine On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 20:31 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote: Camel

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [evolution-patches] Fix for agressive memory segmentation

2006-07-06 Thread Philip Van Hoof
On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 15:18 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: For some strange reason I thought the pstring stuff already did that, oops. I guess I was thinking of similar code I wrote a few years back for another project... This patch does it the way I had done it in another project of mine

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [evolution-patches] Fix for agressive memory segmentation

2006-07-06 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 21:32 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote: On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 15:18 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: For some strange reason I thought the pstring stuff already did that, oops. I guess I was thinking of similar code I wrote a few years back for another project... This

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [evolution-patches] Fix for agressive memory segmentation

2006-07-06 Thread Philip Van Hoof
On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 23:22 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote: On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 15:18 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: For some strange reason I thought the pstring stuff already did that, oops. I guess I was thinking of similar code I wrote a few years back for another project... This

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [evolution-patches] Fix for agressive memory segmentation

2006-07-06 Thread Philip Van Hoof
On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 15:18 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: For some strange reason I thought the pstring stuff already did that, oops. I guess I was thinking of similar code I wrote a few years back for another project... This patch does it the way I had done it in another project of mine