Re: [Evolution-hackers] Did 3.4 just get really slow?

2012-05-21 Thread Milan Crha
On Sat, 2012-05-19 at 23:21 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: [imapx:B] vanished: 65754 camel_folder_summary_remove_uid() took 0.033764s [imapx:B] vanished: 65755 camel_folder_summary_remove_uid() took 0.043655s ... What the hell happened? This code wasn't this slow before, was it?

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Did 3.4 just get really slow?

2012-05-20 Thread Xavier Bestel
Le samedi 19 mai 2012 à 07:26 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams a écrit : On Sat, 2012-05-19 at 10:49 +0100, Onyeibo Oku wrote: On Sat, 2012-05-19 at 11:25 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote: Le vendredi 18 mai 2012 à 23:43 +0100, David Woodhouse a écrit : I just updated to Fedora 17 and Evolution

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Did 3.4 just get really slow?

2012-05-19 Thread Xavier Bestel
Hi, Le vendredi 18 mai 2012 à 23:43 +0100, David Woodhouse a écrit : I just updated to Fedora 17 and Evolution 3.4. It seems to have just noticed that I archived a quarter's mail, and is deleting the old messages from its cache... taking about 40 seconds to delete each 1,000 messages. This

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Did 3.4 just get really slow?

2012-05-19 Thread David Woodhouse
On Sat, 2012-05-19 at 11:25 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote: I'm using Debian, and found Evo getting slower and slower (I've got something like 44K messages in my inbox). Now I just removed Tracker from my system, and it's snappy again. Happy me. Hm, that would affect Evolution's *own*

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Did 3.4 just get really slow?

2012-05-19 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
On Sat, 2012-05-19 at 10:49 +0100, Onyeibo Oku wrote: On Sat, 2012-05-19 at 11:25 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote: Le vendredi 18 mai 2012 à 23:43 +0100, David Woodhouse a écrit : I just updated to Fedora 17 and Evolution 3.4. It seems to have just noticed that I archived a quarter's mail,

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Did 3.4 just get really slow?

2012-05-19 Thread David Woodhouse
On Sat, 2012-05-19 at 07:26 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: Once the index is up to date there is almost no way it noticeably effects performance unless something else it wrong. Heh. To effect performance¹ would be to make it go fast, right? :) -- dwmw2 ¹ as opposed to affect performance

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Did 3.4 just get really slow?

2012-05-19 Thread Xavier Bestel
Some kind of indexing system. Useless for the pain it causes. Onyeibo Oku twoho...@gmail.com a écrit : On Sat, 2012-05-19 at 11:25 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote: Hi, Le vendredi 18 mai 2012 à 23:43 +0100, David Woodhouse a écrit : I just updated to Fedora 17 and Evolution 3.4. It seems