Re: [Evolution-hackers] Fedora builds with 2.32.2+ patches

2011-04-11 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Fr, 2011-04-08 at 16:31 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 15:31 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: On Do, 2011-04-07 at 11:33 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: Once this passes muster, I'll push these patches (probably *without* the NTLM bits, if you're looking closely at what I

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Fedora builds with 2.32.2+ patches

2011-04-11 Thread Milan Crha
On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 10:54 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: Listing sources shows local:/system instead of local:system and opening local:system also still fails. Milan pointed to the history of e-source.c, but I don't see which (other?) commits are needed to fix these issues. Hi, try

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Fedora builds with 2.32.2+ patches

2011-04-08 Thread sean finney
Hi David, On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 01:07:38PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: Personally, no. I'd rather ignore MAPI completely and get on with the implementation of evolution-ews. Understandable, though as we've discussed on IRC we don't really have the option of using that here, at least for

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Fedora builds with 2.32.2+ patches

2011-04-08 Thread David Woodhouse
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 09:54 +0200, sean finney wrote: Sounds like you would be in a good position to do it though. Because I'm not a gnome dev, I (a) don't have push access, and (b) am a bit hesitant to go against Milan's wishes, since he's the dev who is primarily keeping things up for

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Fedora builds with 2.32.2+ patches

2011-04-08 Thread David Woodhouse
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 15:08 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: Hmm, I still do not like the idea of adding things to gnome-2-32 branch, I thought I saw you telling that if anyone will complain then you'll not do that and I thought I complained to it, but I cannot find the email right now, so I cannot

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Fedora builds with 2.32.2+ patches

2011-04-08 Thread sean finney
Hi David, On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 09:08:28AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: You're more than welcome to use git.infradead.org if you want. But even if Milan sees the 2.32 branch as being dead and doesn't want to spend any of his own time on it (and nobody can blame him for that), I would hope

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Fedora builds with 2.32.2+ patches

2011-04-08 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Do, 2011-04-07 at 11:33 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: Once this passes muster, I'll push these patches (probably *without* the NTLM bits, if you're looking closely at what I included) to the gnome-2-32 branches and perhaps start doing a 'final call' for 2.32.3 candidate bugs/patches.

[Evolution-hackers] Fedora builds with 2.32.2+ patches

2011-04-07 Thread David Woodhouse
I have built some Fedora 14 packages of Evo 2.32.2 with the latest additional fixes, for testing. The main reason for doing this is to fix bug 646164 with modified instances of recurring appointments, since that's really getting on our tits as we implement that part of the Evolution-EWS back end.

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Fedora builds with 2.32.2+ patches

2011-04-07 Thread sean finney
Hi David, On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 11:33:22AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: Once this passes muster, I'll push these patches (probably *without* the NTLM bits, if you're looking closely at what I included) to the gnome-2-32 branches and perhaps start doing a 'final call' for 2.32.3 candidate