On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 13:17 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
This is a version (version eight) that actually works (afaics).
This version (version nine) fixes a leak when new messages arrive.
However. The implementation/architecture of Camel requires that new
messages get transformed into
On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 16:47 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 13:17 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
This is a version (version eight) that actually works (afaics).
This version (version nine) fixes a leak when new messages arrive.
This version (version ten) fixes a few
On Wed, 2006-07-12 at 09:12 +0530, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote:
On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 20:33 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 23:14 +0530, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote:
ps. I think we should do a in-depth tech-meeting about this stuff. What
do you think, Harish? I have a few
On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 23:14 +0530, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote:
I'm removing the patches mailing list ;-)
On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 16:47 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
Currently it's obviously consuming more memory when new messages arrive
(compared to the mmap technique). In Evolution, such a
