someone will
inevitably waste time maintaining them, not realizing or forgetting
they're dead.
Oh yes. I remember doing that several times when I was porting it to Windows...
--tml
___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
I probably wouldn't get rid of mail/README.async, that's useful
knowledge in there iirc.
Jeff
On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 15:14 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
With GNOME 2.22 development just now getting under way, this seems like
a good time for some fall cleaning. There's quite a few files still
On Fri, 2007-09-21 at 09:44 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
I probably wouldn't get rid of mail/README.async, that's useful
knowledge in there iirc.
Agreed. I'll mention that in the bug. There's some useful unshipped
README files in Camel too, I believe.
Matthew Barnes
With GNOME 2.22 development just now getting under way, this seems like
a good time for some fall cleaning. There's quite a few files still
living in Subversion trunk that we did not ship for GNOME 2.20.
I've filed a series of bug reports about this, hoping that we can
collectively sift through
Matthew,
I think this is a nice move. We should get rid of all the dead files out
of the trunk. We can take this over bugzilla.
-Srini.
On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 15:14 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
With GNOME 2.22 development just now getting under way, this seems like
a good time for some fall
