Re: [Evolution-hackers] Memory leaks

2010-09-08 Thread Michael Meeks
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 16:32 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 13:10 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > > The fixes I mentioned are sitting in my working tree, and I'll commit > > and push them today. This is awesome work - thanks ! :-) > > If they're referenced by a global v

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Memory leaks

2010-08-23 Thread Milan Crha
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 13:10 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 13:25 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=627707 > > I've grouped a bunch of different GtkHTML reports together. although I'm > not sure that was the right thing to do. >

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Memory leaks

2010-08-23 Thread David Woodhouse
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 13:25 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 11:12 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > > I got offended by Evolution growing to almost 4GiB and having to be > > killed if I wanted to use my workstation for anything else, so I've > > started running it in Valgrind. > > >

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Memory leaks

2010-08-23 Thread Milan Crha
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 11:12 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > I got offended by Evolution growing to almost 4GiB and having to be > killed if I wanted to use my workstation for anything else, so I've > started running it in Valgrind. > > I've filed bugs for the reports of 'definitely lost', and have

[Evolution-hackers] Memory leaks

2010-08-23 Thread David Woodhouse
I got offended by Evolution growing to almost 4GiB and having to be killed if I wanted to use my workstation for anything else, so I've started running it in Valgrind. I've filed bugs for the reports of 'definitely lost', and have fixed a bunch of them. But there are *lots* of reports of memory b