Re: [Evolution-hackers] Memory leaks

2010-09-08 Thread Michael Meeks
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 16:32 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 13:10 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: The fixes I mentioned are sitting in my working tree, and I'll commit and push them today. This is awesome work - thanks ! :-) If they're referenced by a global

[Evolution-hackers] Memory leaks

2010-08-23 Thread David Woodhouse
I got offended by Evolution growing to almost 4GiB and having to be killed if I wanted to use my workstation for anything else, so I've started running it in Valgrind. I've filed bugs for the reports of 'definitely lost', and have fixed a bunch of them. But there are *lots* of reports of memory

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Memory leaks

2010-08-23 Thread Milan Crha
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 11:12 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: I got offended by Evolution growing to almost 4GiB and having to be killed if I wanted to use my workstation for anything else, so I've started running it in Valgrind. I've filed bugs for the reports of 'definitely lost', and have

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Memory leaks

2010-08-23 Thread David Woodhouse
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 13:25 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 11:12 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: I got offended by Evolution growing to almost 4GiB and having to be killed if I wanted to use my workstation for anything else, so I've started running it in Valgrind. I've

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Memory leaks

2010-08-23 Thread Milan Crha
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 13:10 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 13:25 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=627707 I've grouped a bunch of different GtkHTML reports together. although I'm not sure that was the right thing to do. The