On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 15:40 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 15:22 +0100, Andrew S. Townley wrote:
> > I haven't looked through evolution's source in great detail, but I've
> > seen enough that you're using "magic" URIs to trigger
> > application-specific behavior as well. May
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 15:22 +0100, Andrew S. Townley wrote:
> From looking at the examples, am I right in thinking that
> gtkhtml/components/editor is essentially a "plain", embeddable GTK+
> widget, and the html-editor is a bonobo component, requiring all the
> CORBA plumbing? If so, I think I'll
Matthew,
Thanks for the response and the info.
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 08:25 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 12:03 +0100, Andrew S. Townley wrote:
> > I was trying to figure out how searching worked with GtkHTML, and I
> > discovered the following minor bug. Calling gtk_html_
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 12:03 +0100, Andrew S. Townley wrote:
> I was trying to figure out how searching worked with GtkHTML, and I
> discovered the following minor bug. Calling gtk_html_isearch() assumed
> that the editor component had already been set. If it wasn't, you got a
> segfault.
Thanks
Hi,
I was trying to figure out how searching worked with GtkHTML, and I
discovered the following minor bug. Calling gtk_html_isearch() assumed
that the editor component had already been set. If it wasn't, you got a
segfault.
Now, I haven't actually found anywhere that the editor API *is* set, s
