Re: [Evolution-hackers] Rebasing gtk3 branches

2011-01-24 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 08:50 +0100, Milan Crha wrote: what about wait till Wednesday, after evolution team meeting, and then merge gtk3 branches to master branches, and require gtk3 for the Monday 2.91.6 release? It saves a bit of work for you, and also forces people to fix new issues related

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Rebasing gtk3 branches

2011-01-23 Thread Milan Crha
On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 14:01 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote: Would anyone mind if I do another round of gtk3 rebases? Hi, what about wait till Wednesday, after evolution team meeting, and then merge gtk3 branches to master branches, and require gtk3 for the Monday 2.91.6 release? It saves a

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Rebasing gtk3 branches

2011-01-12 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 15:13 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote: If no one objects I'll plan to do this later this week. So speak up now or commit now if you have any pending changes. I'll make sure any last minute commits aren't lost. The gtk3 branches are rebased now. Delete your local copy.

[Evolution-hackers] Rebasing gtk3 branches

2011-01-09 Thread Matthew Barnes
I took all our gtk3 branches and PRIVATELY rebased them against the latest master branches, and have also removed all the gtk2 backward- compatibility hacks that have piled up (no more gtk-compat.h, etc.). These private branches of mine are much closer to what will eventually be merged to master