Re: [Evolution-hackers] Retiring evolution-exchange

2012-06-06 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 08:55 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: What about a compromise, drop support for evolution-exchange when 3.7.x development begins? I suppose it'll be fair to have the main API changes done and any potential community person taking care of it will not need to learn all the hard

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Retiring evolution-exchange

2012-06-04 Thread Milan Crha
On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 15:48 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: The backend-facing APIs less so. They tend to see more churn anyway, even without my branch. I can't think of a recent release where the backend APIs didn't change a little. And that's fine -- the damage is contained -- but we still

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Retiring evolution-exchange

2012-06-01 Thread Chenthill
On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 16:15 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: The release of Evolution-ActiveSync brings the number of Evolution Data Server backend modules for Microsoft Exchange up to four. Even if we had the manpower to adequately maintain all these, which we don't, four different backends for

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Retiring evolution-exchange

2012-06-01 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 15:19 +0530, Chenthill wrote: Then why not retire evolution-mapi instead of evolution-exchange ? I hadn't considered that. I'll defer to Milan to make that call. I thought evolution-mapi worked with Exchange 2003 servers at least in theory; I don't know how much actual

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Retiring evolution-exchange

2012-06-01 Thread Chenthill
On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 06:57 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 15:19 +0530, Chenthill wrote: Then why not retire evolution-mapi instead of evolution-exchange ? I hadn't considered that. I'll defer to Milan to make that call. I thought evolution-mapi worked with Exchange

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Retiring evolution-exchange

2012-06-01 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 08:39 -0600, Vibha Yadav wrote: On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 15:19 +0530, Chenthill wrote: I can provide you the support. I will be getting into the new project coming Monday. I can keep myself involved during free time after a couple of weeks time.. I can also contribute in

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Retiring evolution-exchange

2012-06-01 Thread Milan Crha
On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 06:57 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 15:19 +0530, Chenthill wrote: Then why not retire evolution-mapi instead of evolution-exchange ? I hadn't considered that. I'll defer to Milan to make that call. I thought evolution-mapi worked with Exchange

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Retiring evolution-exchange

2012-06-01 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 19:49 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: evolution-ews - for 2007,2010 servers (through https, with simpler dependencies) - it's currently semi-maintained - note the EWS implementation on Exchange servers is not feature complete on 2007 servers (I read/saw some

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Retiring evolution-exchange

2012-05-31 Thread Akhil Laddha
On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 15:54 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: I'm adding Evolution-GroupWise to the retiree list, since it no longer has any active maintainers. Haven't heard any objections so I take that to mean consent from the rest of the team. I don't plan to release any more 3.5 tarballs