Re: [Evolution-hackers] WebKit port of the composer (Daniel Vratil)

2012-06-12 Thread Karl Relton
On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 18:10 +, Daniel Vratil wrote: > Hello hackers, > > I have nearly finished reworking the e-mail formatter (details in the other > mail) and I want to slowly turn my attention to the composer. It will be a > lot > of work, but hopefully I'll make it for 3.6 (no, I WILL

Re: [Evolution-hackers] WebKit port of the composer

2012-06-04 Thread Milan Crha
On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 13:01 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > I thought they were both aspects of the address editor (presumably > ENameSelectorEntry; I pay little attention to the UI side of evo), and > could have sworn that both had been filed under "oh, we won't care about > those until we revamp

Re: [Evolution-hackers] WebKit port of the composer

2012-06-04 Thread David Woodhouse
On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 09:04 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > > Hi, > both issues are unrelated to Dan's changes, from my point of view, and > I suppose both of them are filled as bugs in bugzilla. Dan's effort is > to get rid of GtkHTML from evolution, while your issues are partly in > ENameSele

Re: [Evolution-hackers] WebKit port of the composer

2012-06-04 Thread Milan Crha
On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 23:43 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > Fixing some of the brokenness of the To/Cc/Bcc headers in the composer > would be wonderful. > ... > We should also be able to send a mail with the following headers: > To: Some people I want to invite to my party : ; > Bcc: f...@bar.

Re: [Evolution-hackers] WebKit port of the composer

2012-06-01 Thread David Woodhouse
On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 16:49 +0200, Daniel Vratil wrote: > If you have any special wish (I bet Andre will come with many feature > requests > from bugzilla :P ) you'd like to have in the new composer, please share them > now. Regarding features, I want to make exact copy of GtkHTMLEditor and only

Re: [Evolution-hackers] WebKit port of the composer

2012-06-01 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 18:38 +0200, Dan Vratil wrote: > > That was a mistake on > > my part because it precludes us from embedding the editor in an existing > > window, and you'll likely want to do that later when you start working > > on a Conversation View. ;) > > I probably missed something..

Re: [Evolution-hackers] WebKit port of the composer

2012-06-01 Thread Dan Vratil
On Friday 01 of June 2012 11:47:31 Matthew Barnes wrote: > On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 16:49 +0200, Daniel Vratil wrote: > > I have nearly finished reworking the e-mail formatter (details in the > > other > > mail) and I want to slowly turn my attention to the composer. It will be a > > lot of work, but

Re: [Evolution-hackers] WebKit port of the composer

2012-06-01 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 16:49 +0200, Daniel Vratil wrote: > I have nearly finished reworking the e-mail formatter (details in the other > mail) and I want to slowly turn my attention to the composer. It will be a > lot > of work, but hopefully I'll make it for 3.6 (no, I WILL make it for 3.6!!!).

[Evolution-hackers] WebKit port of the composer

2012-06-01 Thread Daniel Vratil
Hello hackers, I have nearly finished reworking the e-mail formatter (details in the other mail) and I want to slowly turn my attention to the composer. It will be a lot of work, but hopefully I'll make it for 3.6 (no, I WILL make it for 3.6!!!). This e-mail is to give you some heads up about w