Re: [Evolution-hackers] What 'role' should a resource-type cutype have?
On Fri, 2006-06-16 at 11:46 +0530, Chenthill wrote: > Hi Jules, > On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 13:15 +0200, Jules Colding wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I can't decide upon the ICAL role that a ECalComponentAttendee should > > have if cutype is a resource. I am currently doing: > > > > attendee->cutype = ICAL_CUTYPE_RESOURCE; > > attendee->role = ICAL_ROLE_NONPARTICIPANT; // what else? > > > > Is that the best thing to do? - Thoughts? > yes, AFAIK the resource would be a non-participant. OK, thanks a lot. -- jules ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] What 'role' should a resource-type cutype have?
Hi Jules, On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 13:15 +0200, Jules Colding wrote: > Hi, > > I can't decide upon the ICAL role that a ECalComponentAttendee should > have if cutype is a resource. I am currently doing: > > attendee->cutype = ICAL_CUTYPE_RESOURCE; > attendee->role = ICAL_ROLE_NONPARTICIPANT; // what else? > > Is that the best thing to do? - Thoughts? yes, AFAIK the resource would be a non-participant. thanks, Chenthill. > > > Thanks, > jules > > > > ___ > Evolution-hackers mailing list > Evolution-hackers@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
[Evolution-hackers] What 'role' should a resource-type cutype have?
Hi, I can't decide upon the ICAL role that a ECalComponentAttendee should have if cutype is a resource. I am currently doing: attendee->cutype = ICAL_CUTYPE_RESOURCE; attendee->role = ICAL_ROLE_NONPARTICIPANT; // what else? Is that the best thing to do? - Thoughts? Thanks, jules ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers