On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 11:00 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 21:29 +0530, Parthasarathi Susarla wrote:
> > On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 10:49 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > > 3.6.1. The origination date field
> > >
> > >The origination date field consists of the field name "
On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 21:29 +0530, Parthasarathi Susarla wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 10:49 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > 3.6.1. The origination date field
> >
> >The origination date field consists of the field name "Date" followed
> >by a date-time specification.
> >
> > orig-dat
On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 10:49 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> 3.6.1. The origination date field
>
>The origination date field consists of the field name "Date" followed
>by a date-time specification.
>
> orig-date = "Date:" date-time CRLF
>
>The origination date specifies
3.6.1. The origination date field
The origination date field consists of the field name "Date" followed
by a date-time specification.
orig-date = "Date:" date-time CRLF
The origination date specifies the date and time at which the creator
of the message indicated that the
On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 03:04 +0530, Parthasarathi Susarla wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 10:20 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > actually, that's not true. date_sent is gotten from the MIME message
> > headers (Date: header, fwiw).
> >
> But isnt that the Date received or the date created and not
On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 10:20 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> actually, that's not true. date_sent is gotten from the MIME message
> headers (Date: header, fwiw).
>
But isnt that the Date received or the date created and not the date
send per se?? (RFC 822)
Cheers,
partha
actually, that's not true. date_sent is gotten from the MIME message
headers (Date: header, fwiw).
Jeff
On Tue, 2005-11-22 at 14:56 +0100, Jules Colding wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-11-22 at 18:44 +0530, Parthasarathi Susarla wrote:
> > On Tue, 2005-11-22 at 13:55 +0100, Jules Colding wrote:
> > > Hi,
>
On Tue, 2005-11-22 at 18:44 +0530, Parthasarathi Susarla wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-11-22 at 13:55 +0100, Jules Colding wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am currently retrieving data from a MAPI object and most data is
> > easily mapped from MAPI into corresponding Camel data types. One is
> > missing though -
On Tue, 2005-11-22 at 13:55 +0100, Jules Colding wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am currently retrieving data from a MAPI object and most data is
> easily mapped from MAPI into corresponding Camel data types. One is
> missing though - the "CamelMessageInfoBase.date_sent" type doesn't seem
> to exist within the
Hi,
I am currently retrieving data from a MAPI object and most data is
easily mapped from MAPI into corresponding Camel data types. One is
missing though - the "CamelMessageInfoBase.date_sent" type doesn't seem
to exist within the range of MAPI properties available on the object.
Does the sent ti
10 matches
Mail list logo
