Re: [Evolution-hackers] building evolution-data-server against the already installed libdb

2006-03-06 Thread Ross Burton
On Mon, 2006-02-27 at 17:49 -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote: Hello! I'm trying to convince the maintainers of the evolution-data-server FreeBSD port (http://freshports.org/databases/evolution-data-server) to build the software against the db4-version installed by the separate port of

Re: [Evolution-hackers] building evolution-data-server against the already installed libdb

2006-03-05 Thread Mikhail Zabaluev
В Пнд, 27/02/2006 в 17:49 -0500, Mikhail Teterin пишет: I'm trying to convince the maintainers of the evolution-data-server FreeBSD port (http://freshports.org/databases/evolution-data-server) to build the software against the db4-version installed by the separate port of SleepyCat's db4

Re: [Evolution-hackers] building evolution-data-server against the already installed libdb

2006-03-05 Thread Peter Colijn
On 3/6/06, Mikhail Zabaluev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I used to compile e-d-s 1.4 along an external db4.3, by applying a simple patch. It didn't seem to cause any problems. You are of course free to apply your own patches; however, in the long term, using a distribution's version of bdb will

Re: [Evolution-hackers] building evolution-data-server against the already installed libdb

2006-03-05 Thread Tor Lillqvist
As far as I can recall, when I asked the same thing, the response was that this is how Berkeley DB is supposed to be used, embedded into another product. That some (all?) Linux distributions choose to also ship a separately installed instance was irrelevant ;) --tml