Re: [Evolution-hackers] evolution's UI, consistency and codebase

2007-07-04 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le jeudi 31 mai 2007 à 11:01 -0400, Daniel Gryniewicz a écrit : On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 15:00 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 11:19 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: Le jeudi 31 mai 2007 à 08:59 +, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit : On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 10:36 +0200,

Re: [Evolution-hackers] evolution's UI, consistency and codebase

2007-05-31 Thread Frederic Crozat
Le jeudi 31 mai 2007 à 07:19 +, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit : Last point is, why is the mail view headers fixed (like not look like buttons) in 2.10 and not the other views as well (memos, calendars, contacts) In few themes, Ive seen that it looks like a table header, but not in all

Re: [Evolution-hackers] evolution's UI, consistency and codebase

2007-05-31 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le jeudi 31 mai 2007 à 07:19 +, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit : On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 00:17 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: First thing that hit me was that it didn't use GtkTreeView and that it doesn't understand _ markup. I think that can be moved to GtkTreeView and shouldn't have

Re: [Evolution-hackers] evolution's UI, consistency and codebase

2007-05-31 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 10:24 +0200, Frederic Crozat wrote: Le jeudi 31 mai 2007 à 07:19 +, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit : Last point is, why is the mail view headers fixed (like not look like buttons) in 2.10 and not the other views as well (memos, calendars, contacts) In few

Re: [Evolution-hackers] evolution's UI, consistency and codebase

2007-05-31 Thread Frederic Crozat
Le jeudi 31 mai 2007 à 08:38 +, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit : On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 10:24 +0200, Frederic Crozat wrote: Le jeudi 31 mai 2007 à 07:19 +, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit : Last point is, why is the mail view headers fixed (like not look like buttons) in 2.10 and not the

Re: [Evolution-hackers] evolution's UI, consistency and codebase

2007-05-31 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 10:36 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: Le jeudi 31 mai 2007 à 07:19 +, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit : On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 00:17 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: First thing that hit me was that it didn't use GtkTreeView and that it doesn't understand _

Re: [Evolution-hackers] evolution's UI, consistency and codebase

2007-05-31 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 11:19 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: Le jeudi 31 mai 2007 à 08:59 +, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit : On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 10:36 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: I've seen that too, but the point was more: Why are the message view headers looking different

Re: [Evolution-hackers] evolution's UI, consistency and codebase

2007-05-31 Thread Daniel Gryniewicz
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 15:00 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 11:19 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: Le jeudi 31 mai 2007 à 08:59 +, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit : On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 10:36 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: I've seen that too, but the point

[Evolution-hackers] evolution's UI, consistency and codebase

2007-05-30 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Hi list, big title, but probably not a big deal (at least for the case I'm exposing) After reading [1] and [2] and part of the HIG, I started to see lots of bad dialogs in evolution. I've already tried to fix some of this UI badness (imap-features plugin) but today I came across the Customize