Re: [Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org
On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 15:20 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: Dear Nirav, Ping. :) my two questions still stand. Can you please answer them? Am Dienstag, den 18.08.2009, 12:54 +0200 schrieb Andre Klapper: So have you tried creating a new account on go-evolution.org? If so, please share the steps. Because I fail. Removing the very basic features of a wiki (participation) is not what I'd call a solution. Am Donnerstag, den 23.07.2009, 12:22 +0200 schrieb Andre Klapper: Am Donnerstag, den 23.07.2009, 00:54 -0600 schrieb Nirav Kumar: Migrating Wiki to live.gnome.org/evolution may be difficult with the high data content that evolution wiki holds. Please provide exact numbers. Thanks, andre signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org
Dear Nirav, my two questions still stand. Can you please answer them? Am Dienstag, den 18.08.2009, 12:54 +0200 schrieb Andre Klapper: So have you tried creating a new account on go-evolution.org? If so, please share the steps. Because I fail. Removing the very basic features of a wiki (participation) is not what I'd call a solution. Am Donnerstag, den 23.07.2009, 12:22 +0200 schrieb Andre Klapper: Am Donnerstag, den 23.07.2009, 00:54 -0600 schrieb Nirav Kumar: Migrating Wiki to live.gnome.org/evolution may be difficult with the high data content that evolution wiki holds. Please provide exact numbers. Thanks, andre -- mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org
Hi Andre, There were some changes done in the LocalSetting files to restrict account creation.Seems it is not fully working. Will be working with IST department for closure on this. Regards Nirav On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 13:34 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: Hi Nirav, any news here? http://www.go-evolution.org/index.php?title=Special:Recentchangesdays=7 andre Am Donnerstag, den 23.07.2009, 19:20 -0600 schrieb Nirav Kumar: On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 14:48 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 12:17 -0600, Nirav Kumar wrote: As such any takers for revamping wiki on a continuous basis? Define revamping. To revise(make changes) or reconstruct Probably i can give a try for a resource for revamping Wiki and for installing captcha and updating drupple for go-evolution.org. Do you mean Drupal? That would answer my earlier question. Yes live.gnome.org uses MoinMoin, go-evolution.org uses Drupal? Mostly Drupal gets used.I am catching up with IST on details.Will confirm. Matthew Barnes ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org
Hi Andre, The changes were done on 13th Aug and hence thereafter i am not seeing any new account creation.Seems things are working OK. Regards Nirav On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 02:56 -0600, Nirav Kumar wrote: Hi Andre, There were some changes done in the LocalSetting files to restrict account creation.Seems it is not fully working. Will be working with IST department for closure on this. Regards Nirav On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 13:34 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: Hi Nirav, any news here? http://www.go-evolution.org/index.php?title=Special:Recentchangesdays=7 andre Am Donnerstag, den 23.07.2009, 19:20 -0600 schrieb Nirav Kumar: On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 14:48 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 12:17 -0600, Nirav Kumar wrote: As such any takers for revamping wiki on a continuous basis? Define revamping. To revise(make changes) or reconstruct Probably i can give a try for a resource for revamping Wiki and for installing captcha and updating drupple for go-evolution.org. Do you mean Drupal? That would answer my earlier question. Yes live.gnome.org uses MoinMoin, go-evolution.org uses Drupal? Mostly Drupal gets used.I am catching up with IST on details.Will confirm. Matthew Barnes ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org
Hi Nirav, any news here? http://www.go-evolution.org/index.php?title=Special:Recentchangesdays=7 andre Am Donnerstag, den 23.07.2009, 19:20 -0600 schrieb Nirav Kumar: On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 14:48 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 12:17 -0600, Nirav Kumar wrote: As such any takers for revamping wiki on a continuous basis? Define revamping. To revise(make changes) or reconstruct Probably i can give a try for a resource for revamping Wiki and for installing captcha and updating drupple for go-evolution.org. Do you mean Drupal? That would answer my earlier question. Yes live.gnome.org uses MoinMoin, go-evolution.org uses Drupal? Mostly Drupal gets used.I am catching up with IST on details.Will confirm. Matthew Barnes -- mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed http://www.iomc.de/ | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 11:56 +0530, Chenthill wrote: On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 07:25 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 11:32 +0530, Chenthill wrote: The archived contents would be eventually moved to www.gnome.org/projects/evolution . Time-line for the same is not yet decided. Until then the contents would remain in go-evolution.org. Okay, so what does moving wiki contents to a non-wiki website mean exactly? Do we snapshot all the pages and copy the static HTML? And if we do that, how do we find archived wiki pages without the wiki's search feature? I guess we'd have to set up a global index page or something? Yes copying the static html. Manual work might be required. We should be having indexes like we have already at, http://projects.gnome.org/evolution/developer.shtml . Another option, perhaps only for the short-term, might be to just lock down go-evolution.org so no new accounts, pages, or edits are possible. That should preserve the search feature, and also solve the spam problem, no? Possible. We still need get the admin right for that. Nirav ? Let me know the plan for migration and i will try to get things set up accordingly. On a different note, now that we've decided to move we need to compile a list of which pages to move. How about we set up a wiki page for that and invite both developers and the community (or at least the evo-list subscribers) to add what wiki pages they'd like to see moved. Set a deadline of, say, end of August? Lets first gather the contents to be migrated to lgo and gnome.org/projects/evolution. This will give us an idea to choose a right dead-line along with individuals for the tasks. On a third note, anyone know of a good MediaWiki-to-MoinMoin syntax conversion program? My Google results have yielded mostly conversion scripts in the opposite direction (MoinMoin-to-MediaWiki), or else software that requires admin access to the MoinMoin database. I searched for it sometime back. I did find scripts to convert form moinmoin-to-mediawiki but not vice-versa :( May be a question on pgo might help to find if anyone else knows ? - Chenthill. Matthew Barnes ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org
We had a discussion in yesterday's #evolution-meet about the go-evolution.org wiki to conclude on things. We have now made a decision to move the wiki to l.g.o. The archived contents would be eventually moved to www.gnome.org/projects/evolution . Time-line for the same is not yet decided. Until then the contents would remain in go-evolution.org. Meeting logs - http://projects.gnome.org/evolution/meeting-logs/2009-07-29.shtml . Thanks, Chenthill. On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 17:51 +, Matthew Barnes wrote: On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 22:57 +0530, Johnny Jacob wrote: http://www.go-evolution.org/Special:Version Mediawiki :-) Ah, thanks for that! Now I can actually conduct some experiments. Matthew Barnes ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 11:32 +0530, Chenthill wrote: The archived contents would be eventually moved to www.gnome.org/projects/evolution . Time-line for the same is not yet decided. Until then the contents would remain in go-evolution.org. Okay, so what does moving wiki contents to a non-wiki website mean exactly? Do we snapshot all the pages and copy the static HTML? And if we do that, how do we find archived wiki pages without the wiki's search feature? I guess we'd have to set up a global index page or something? Another option, perhaps only for the short-term, might be to just lock down go-evolution.org so no new accounts, pages, or edits are possible. That should preserve the search feature, and also solve the spam problem, no? On a different note, now that we've decided to move we need to compile a list of which pages to move. How about we set up a wiki page for that and invite both developers and the community (or at least the evo-list subscribers) to add what wiki pages they'd like to see moved. Set a deadline of, say, end of August? On a third note, anyone know of a good MediaWiki-to-MoinMoin syntax conversion program? My Google results have yielded mostly conversion scripts in the opposite direction (MoinMoin-to-MediaWiki), or else software that requires admin access to the MoinMoin database. Matthew Barnes signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org
On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 19:20 -0600, Nirav Kumar wrote: On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 14:48 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 12:17 -0600, Nirav Kumar wrote: As such any takers for revamping wiki on a continuous basis? Define revamping. To revise(make changes) or reconstruct Probably i can give a try for a resource for revamping Wiki and for installing captcha and updating drupple for go-evolution.org. Do you mean Drupal? That would answer my earlier question. Yes live.gnome.org uses MoinMoin, go-evolution.org uses Drupal? Mostly Drupal gets used. http://www.go-evolution.org/Special:Version Mediawiki :-) -- Johnny (johnnyjacob.wordpress.com | johnnyjacob.org) May you share freely, never taking more than you give signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org
On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 11:09 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 06:15 -0600, P Chenthill wrote: We would still need to maintain the old data to know the history though they may become obsolete. Certainly a lot of things mentioned still hold true ;) A compromise might be to only migrate the pages with current and accurate information to l.g.o, and keep go-evolution.org around as a historical archive. Archived pages brought back to life at a later date could be migrated individually. It -is- a wiki, after all. Might be interesting to compile a list of pages we still maintain or care about. I have a few not listed on the front page (BugzillaTopics and ReleaseHOWTO, for example). Perhaps a bigger issue is converting the page markup. I've noticed syntactic differences between the two sites [1], but I don't even know what wiki software the two sites are using. Need to see if there's markup migration scripts out there. Matthew Barnes [1] live.gnome.org's markup syntax seems way more expressive and is actually DOCUMENTED! (http://live.gnome.org/HelpOnEditing) Unlike our own. (http://www.go-evolution.org/Help:Editing) Not to mention the style sheets are prettier. **IMHO** I would prefer live.gnome.org . So +1 for that. And somebody suggested that we can redirect go-evolution.org domain to live.gnome.org/evolution -- Johnny (johnnyjacob.wordpress.com | johnnyjacob.org) May you share freely, never taking more than you give signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org
Am including nirav in the thread. He is working on with the novell IST to get the required rights. He would be able to provide more details.. Thanks, Chenthill. On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 11:06 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: Am Sonntag, den 12.07.2009, 21:31 -0400 schrieb Matthew Barnes: I don't know how feasible this is, but what do you guys think about eventually migrating the wiki to live.gnome.org/evolution. I am all for it. I have no idea who has admin rights to the wiki According to Parag Srini has sysop rights. andre ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org
Hi Andre, Migrating Wiki to live.gnome.org/evolution may be difficult with the high data content that evolution wiki holds. I would believe that installing captcha and updating drupple should be able to provide the desired results.I am working with Novell IST and hope to have something positive in next few days. Regards Nirav On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 12:06 +0530, Chenthill wrote: Am including nirav in the thread. He is working on with the novell IST to get the required rights. He would be able to provide more details.. Thanks, Chenthill. On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 11:06 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: Am Sonntag, den 12.07.2009, 21:31 -0400 schrieb Matthew Barnes: I don't know how feasible this is, but what do you guys think about eventually migrating the wiki to live.gnome.org/evolution. I am all for it. I have no idea who has admin rights to the wiki According to Parag Srini has sysop rights. andre ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Nirav Kumarkni...@novell.com wrote: Hi Andre, Migrating Wiki to live.gnome.org/evolution may be difficult with the high data content that evolution wiki holds. I don't see a high data content. There are Camel docs, plugin docs, some design docs about shell and threading, most of which will have to change anyway, soon. And most of the other links originating from the go-evolution home page points to obsolete contents. There are some test cases, but iirc they are stored in Novell testopia already. I would believe that installing captcha and updating drupple should be able to provide the desired results.I am working with Novell IST and hope to have something positive in next few days. These two are the problems at the moment. But by moving to live.gnome.org, there are other benefits like: - we align more with the rest of the Gnome projects - one place to search docs for all projects and easy to link to docs of other project pages, say libsoup. - no need to create yet-another-new-account to edit evo project pages. anyone with a gnome account can edit pages. and above all, - Gnome sysadmins are easily reachable for non-Novell folks to report and rectify any problems, than Novell IST. There will be a single point of contact for admin related issues. If all these does not convince you, you can save dollars on the storage space for the site ;-) . So imho, it is definitely worth moving to live.gnome.org . Regards Nirav On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 12:06 +0530, Chenthill wrote: Am including nirav in the thread. He is working on with the novell IST to get the required rights. He would be able to provide more details.. Thanks, Chenthill. On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 11:06 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: Am Sonntag, den 12.07.2009, 21:31 -0400 schrieb Matthew Barnes: I don't know how feasible this is, but what do you guys think about eventually migrating the wiki to live.gnome.org/evolution. I am all for it. I have no idea who has admin rights to the wiki According to Parag Srini has sysop rights. andre ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers -- Sankar P http://psankar.blogspot.com ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org
On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 14:35 +0530, Sankar P wrote: I don't see a high data content. There are Camel docs, plugin docs, some design docs about shell and threading, most of which will have to change anyway, soon. And most of the other links originating from the go-evolution home page points to obsolete contents. There are some test cases, but iirc they are stored in Novell testopia already. ...snip... If all these does not convince you, you can save dollars on the storage space for the site ;-) . So imho, it is definitely worth moving to live.gnome.org . +1 Well stated. :) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org
On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 07:34 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 14:35 +0530, Sankar P wrote: I don't see a high data content. There are Camel docs, plugin docs, some design docs about shell and threading, most of which will have to change anyway, soon. And most of the other links originating from the go-evolution home page points to obsolete contents. There are some test cases, but iirc they are stored in Novell testopia already. We would still need to maintain the old data to know the history though they may become obsolete. Certainly a lot of things mentioned still hold true ;) ...snip... If all these does not convince you, you can save dollars on the storage space for the site ;-) . So imho, it is definitely worth moving to live.gnome.org . +1 Well stated. :) I concur with this provided all the old data are still maintained. - Chenthill. ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org
On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 11:09 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 06:15 -0600, P Chenthill wrote: We would still need to maintain the old data to know the history though they may become obsolete. Certainly a lot of things mentioned still hold true ;) A compromise might be to only migrate the pages with current and accurate information to l.g.o, and keep go-evolution.org around as a historical archive. Archived pages brought back to life at a later date could be migrated individually. It -is- a wiki, after all. Makes sense. How about putting the architecture and other historic data on roadmaps into www.gnome.org/projects/evolution and current pages in l.g.o ? Close go-evolution.org once for all. - Chenthill. Might be interesting to compile a list of pages we still maintain or care about. I have a few not listed on the front page (BugzillaTopics and ReleaseHOWTO, for example). Perhaps a bigger issue is converting the page markup. I've noticed syntactic differences between the two sites [1], but I don't even know what wiki software the two sites are using. Need to see if there's markup migration scripts out there. Matthew Barnes [1] live.gnome.org's markup syntax seems way more expressive and is actually DOCUMENTED! (http://live.gnome.org/HelpOnEditing) Unlike our own. (http://www.go-evolution.org/Help:Editing) Not to mention the style sheets are prettier. ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org
Probably i can give a try for a resource for revamping Wiki and for installing captcha and updating drupple for go-evolution.org.This may take approx 2 weeks.If things are not possible, i can confirm earlier and a migration/closure decision can be taken accordingly. Nirav On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 11:09 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 06:15 -0600, P Chenthill wrote: We would still need to maintain the old data to know the history though they may become obsolete. Certainly a lot of things mentioned still hold true ;) A compromise might be to only migrate the pages with current and accurate information to l.g.o, and keep go-evolution.org around as a historical archive. Archived pages brought back to life at a later date could be migrated individually. It -is- a wiki, after all. Might be interesting to compile a list of pages we still maintain or care about. I have a few not listed on the front page (BugzillaTopics and ReleaseHOWTO, for example). Perhaps a bigger issue is converting the page markup. I've noticed syntactic differences between the two sites [1], but I don't even know what wiki software the two sites are using. Need to see if there's markup migration scripts out there. Matthew Barnes [1] live.gnome.org's markup syntax seems way more expressive and is actually DOCUMENTED! (http://live.gnome.org/HelpOnEditing) Unlike our own. (http://www.go-evolution.org/Help:Editing) Not to mention the style sheets are prettier. ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org
On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 14:48 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 12:17 -0600, Nirav Kumar wrote: As such any takers for revamping wiki on a continuous basis? Define revamping. To revise(make changes) or reconstruct Probably i can give a try for a resource for revamping Wiki and for installing captcha and updating drupple for go-evolution.org. Do you mean Drupal? That would answer my earlier question. Yes live.gnome.org uses MoinMoin, go-evolution.org uses Drupal? Mostly Drupal gets used.I am catching up with IST on details.Will confirm. Matthew Barnes ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org
Am Sonntag, den 12.07.2009, 21:31 -0400 schrieb Matthew Barnes: I don't know how feasible this is, but what do you guys think about eventually migrating the wiki to live.gnome.org/evolution. I am all for it. I have no idea who has admin rights to the wiki According to Parag Srini has sysop rights. andre -- mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed http://www.iomc.de/ | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org
On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 00:24 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: Le mardi 24 février 2009 à 00:44 +0100, Andre Klapper a écrit : Hej hej Parag! Some Novell folks told me that you maintain go-evolution.org which is constantly spammed by bots, see Gilles' email here: http://mail.gnome.org/archives/evolution-hackers/2009-February/msg5.html For a quick solution, can you please remove the account GetelNovia? Any proposals for a long term solution, like updating the wiki software (captchas etc)? Any updates on this stuff, I'm now confronted with spambots which create random accounts and write spam to their user page. See: http://www.go-evolution.org/index.php?title=Special:Recentchangesdays=30limit=500 I don't know how feasible this is, but what do you guys think about eventually migrating the wiki to live.gnome.org/evolution. All the pages could be rooted from there, e.g.: go-evolution.org/FAQ - live.gnome.org/evolution/FAQ I have no idea who has admin rights to the wiki nor whether those person(s) even maintain it anymore. I also have not been able to get a straight answer out of anyone after asking repeatedly for admin rights. I presume live.gnome.org is actively maintained with stronger anti-spam measures, and I think it's a more suitable place for Evolution content. Plus, it would be easier to link to other GNOME-related information on that wiki. Matthew Barnes signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
[Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org
Hello list, I know this is probably not the best place to send this but I'm looking for someone to pick up or help in my fight against spam on the wiki. Please help me fix this: http://www.go-evolution.org/Special:Recentchanges and this http://www.go-evolution.org/index.php?title=Evolution_Keyboard_Navigation_Specification_for_Version_2.4action=historyoffset=0limit=500 it's been going on for months and I'm sick of trying to fix it without the proper tools/rights/whatever. Thanks for your attention. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue gilles.dartiguelon...@esiee.org signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org wiki spam
Le mardi 15 mai 2007 à 19:27 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit : On Tue, 2007-05-15 at 15:40 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: Le mardi 15 mai 2007 à 18:51 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit : Hi Gilles, I dont see the spam in the Main_Page. Am I seeing elsewhere? click on see source as text. It's in a tag with css style making it invisible to users (namely div id=wyikol style=overflow:auto; height: 1px; ) Ah! Caught it. Removed. -Srini. following meeting, I did a quick search and came up with this : http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:ConfirmEdit hope it helps. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
[Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org wiki spam
Hi guys, if this is off-topic, please redirect me to the proper mailing list. I've noticed since yesterday some spam across the wiki. Digging a bit I found that it was kind of widespread (see http://www.go-evolution.org/Special:Recentchanges if you are not convinced). The main page has some spam in it too but I can't fix it since I don't have the proper rights. I've seen a user's comment asking what about turning anonymous editing off ?. Will this be done ? The version of wikipedia seems a bit old too, is an upgrade planned ? -- Gilles Dartiguelongue [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org wiki spam
Le mardi 15 mai 2007 à 18:51 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit : Hi Gilles, I dont see the spam in the Main_Page. Am I seeing elsewhere? click on see source as text. It's in a tag with css style making it invisible to users (namely div id=wyikol style=overflow:auto; height: 1px; ) -- Gilles Dartiguelongue [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org wiki spam
On Tue, 2007-05-15 at 15:40 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: Le mardi 15 mai 2007 à 18:51 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit : Hi Gilles, I dont see the spam in the Main_Page. Am I seeing elsewhere? click on see source as text. It's in a tag with css style making it invisible to users (namely div id=wyikol style=overflow:auto; height: 1px; ) Ah! Caught it. Removed. -Srini. ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
[Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org back up
Still waiting for http://go-evolution.org/ to be live again...
Yay, I just got *way* closer. :) Now it's time to lean back and watch.
Worked. Finally, the wiki is *up* again! :)
--
char *t=[EMAIL PROTECTED];
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;il;i++){ i%8? c=1:
(c=*++x); c128 (s+=h); if (!(h=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
