2007/4/2, Srinivasa Ragavan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 01:12 +0200, Øystein Gisnås wrote:
I discovered a bottleneck for addressbook performance with large
addressbooks. Details at
http://n800evolution.blogspot.com/2007/04/libebook-scalability.html
Looks fine to commit.
A
On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 01:12 +0200, Øystein Gisnås wrote:
I discovered a bottleneck for addressbook performance with large
addressbooks. Details at
http://n800evolution.blogspot.com/2007/04/libebook-scalability.html
A proposed fix is attached. I'm not sure if order matters when
returned from
On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 09:03 +0200, Øystein Gisnås wrote:
I'd also love to create scripts, code and test data to test
performance of some of the most important functions. Then we would be
able to track performance over time in a more scientific way.
http://burtonini.com/bzr/eds-tests/
Check
Ross,
On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 09:11 +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 09:03 +0200, Øystein Gisnås wrote:
I'd also love to create scripts, code and test data to test
performance of some of the most important functions. Then we would be
able to track performance over time in a
On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 10:18 +, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
This sounds really great. If you have the bugs/patches please post them
across.
e-vcard.c | 494 +-
1 file changed, 232 insertions(+), 262 deletions(-)
Urgh. Give me a
On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 10:18 +, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
This sounds really great. If you have the bugs/patches please post them
across.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425464
Ross
--
Ross Burton mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2007/4/2, Ross Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 09:03 +0200, Øystein Gisnås wrote:
I'd also love to create scripts, code and test data to test
performance of some of the most important functions. Then we would be
able to track performance over time in a more scientific way.
I discovered a bottleneck for addressbook performance with large
addressbooks. Details at
http://n800evolution.blogspot.com/2007/04/libebook-scalability.html
A proposed fix is attached. I'm not sure if order matters when
returned from the backend? Does anyone know? If not, g_list_reverse
can be
On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 01:12 +0200, Øystein Gisnås wrote:
I discovered a bottleneck for addressbook performance with large
addressbooks. Details at
http://n800evolution.blogspot.com/2007/04/libebook-scalability.html
A proposed fix is attached. I'm not sure if order matters when
returned from
On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 01:12 +0200, Øystein Gisnås wrote:
I discovered a bottleneck for addressbook performance with large
addressbooks. Details at
http://n800evolution.blogspot.com/2007/04/libebook-scalability.html
Looks fine to commit.
A proposed fix is attached. I'm not sure if order
10 matches
Mail list logo
