On Sat, 2006-07-08 at 00:52 -0600, Veerapuram Varadhan wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 08:26 +, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
>
> Every little change to a message, like marking it
> read/unread/important/flagging etc will result in mmap'ed write, which
> in turn has overhead on performance, may it b
On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 08:26 +, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> It's also that I recently learned about posix_madvise for my camel-
> folder-summary.c mmap() idea. The only way, afaics, to make it
> possible
> to at the right time invoke the right posix_madvise on the addr
> pointer
> of the mmap, is
On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 08:26 +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 21:23 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> Not strictly true. From camel/ in EDS HEAD:
>
> #include
> #include
> #include "libedataserver/e-memory.h"
> #include
> #include
> #include "libedataserver/e-time-utils.h"
> #i
On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 08:28 +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 22:49 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> > Yes sure. But packaging is often specific for all devices. There's
> > mostly also no e-d-s nor camel packages for the target device. So
> > developers basically have to do all this
On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 22:49 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> Yes sure. But packaging is often specific for all devices. There's
> mostly also no e-d-s nor camel packages for the target device. So
> developers basically have to do all this dirty work themselves.
There are EDS packages split into cam
On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 21:23 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> Most Evolution people already know this. This is just the E-mail you
> guys have been asking about (well, actually most of you guys asked me to
> make a bug in bugzilla).
>
>
> The one laptop per child project, Nokia (maemo) and maybe so
On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 23:47 +0400, Mikhail Zabaluev wrote:
> В Чтв, 06/07/2006 в 21:23 +0200, Philip Van Hoof пишет:
> > Tinymail depends on Camel. Camel gets shipped with e-d-s. Tinymail
> > doesn't use *any* of the other e-d-s softwares, libraries nor its data.
>
> I don't see a problem; you ca
В Чтв, 06/07/2006 в 21:23 +0200, Philip Van Hoof пишет:
> Tinymail depends on Camel. Camel gets shipped with e-d-s. Tinymail
> doesn't use *any* of the other e-d-s softwares, libraries nor its data.
I don't see a problem; you can always split the e-d-s install into
several packages. For RPM this i
Most Evolution people already know this. This is just the E-mail you
guys have been asking about (well, actually most of you guys asked me to
make a bug in bugzilla).
The one laptop per child project, Nokia (maemo) and maybe sooner or
later other vendors like PalmSource are getting more and more
