[Evolution-hackers] Why no more embedded AbiWord or Gnumeric views?

2003-12-04 Thread msevior
HI Folks, Why is it that Evolution no longer allows embedded AbiWord or Gnumeric views of document attachments? Is this policy decision or a bug? Martin ___ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Why no more embedded AbiWord or Gnumeric views?

2003-12-04 Thread Rodney Dawes
It does. You just neeed to enable the mime types. There is a GConf key that has a list of mime types that Evolution will allow embedded bonobo controls to work for. This was added at one point in the 1.2 cycle, iirc, due to security concerns. -- dobey On Enj , 2003-12-04 at 07:17, [EMAIL

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Why no more embedded AbiWord or Gnumeric views?

2003-12-04 Thread James Ogley
It does. You just neeed to enable the mime types. There is a GConf key that has a list of mime types that Evolution will allow embedded bonobo controls to work for. This was added at one point in the 1.2 cycle, iirc, due to security concerns. I've looked for this key, but I can't find it -

Re: [Evolution-hackers] panel clock

2003-12-04 Thread Martin Grimme
Am Do, den 04.12.2003 schrieb Patrick um 02:52: I've let Mark (the panel clock maintainer) know that I have a patch for this same bounty which will be ready by Friday morning at the latest. There will be some competition because we're almost done with ours, too. :) Martin

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Drag-n-drop task creation

2003-12-04 Thread Dennis Smit
2) Drag and hovering a message over the Tasks button for 0.3s switches the view to Tasks whilst still dragging, so you can drop into a Task folder. (2) would look swisher on screen, but (1) sounds a lot easier. :) I'am this far that the ESourceSelector within Tasks accepts drops, drags

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Drag-n-drop task creation

2003-12-04 Thread Rodrigo Moya
On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 15:59, Dennis Smit wrote: 2) Drag and hovering a message over the Tasks button for 0.3s switches the view to Tasks whilst still dragging, so you can drop into a Task folder. (2) would look swisher on screen, but (1) sounds a lot easier. :) I'am this far that

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Why no more embedded AbiWord or Gnumeric views?

2003-12-04 Thread Rodney Dawes
/apps/evolution/mail/display/mime_types It's a list of strings like application/x-abiword or such. -- dobey On Enj , 2003-12-04 at 08:36, James Ogley wrote: It does. You just neeed to enable the mime types. There is a GConf key that has a list of mime types that Evolution will allow

[Evolution-hackers] About #127535 and other special calendars

2003-12-04 Thread ERDI Gergo
Hi, Some calendar bouties are about creating special backends that don't really store events, instead, they dynamically provide them. In some aspects, these don't really fit with the current model. First of all, these may not have a URI associated with them, apart from the scheme itself. For

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Drag-n-drop task creation

2003-12-04 Thread Rodrigo Moya
On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 01:38, Not Zed wrote: If only we had an extensible plugin system :-( well, for this you really dont need a plugin system. You just need to hook up that menu item to the context menu. The mailer can use e-d-s libraries, I guess. cheers

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Status bar

2003-12-04 Thread ERDI Gergo
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Ettore Perazzoli wrote: I'll do this and then modify em-folder-view to use the BonoboUI status mechanism when in a standalone message window, but e_activity_handler_* when embedded in the main Evolution shell. How does that sound? Sounds good to me. so how about this

Re: [Evolution-hackers] panel clock

2003-12-04 Thread William Jon McCann
Not Zed wrote: Just FYI, patches (or links to them) are generally submitted to evolution-patches for comment/approval. As listed in the HACKING file in evolution. Um, I know, but it isn't a patch for evolution. It just uses the evolution-data-server API and I thought people might have

Re: [Evolution-hackers] panel clock

2003-12-04 Thread William Jon McCann
Rodrigo Moya wrote: On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 22:00, William Jon McCann wrote: Does anyone have any comments or suggestions for the latest patch in http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=128283 the patch is for gnome-panel, so I can't comment, but the screenshots look really nice, and very close to

[Evolution-hackers] libical status

2003-12-04 Thread Armin Bauer
Hi, Im one of the developers of Multisync, a multi-purpose synchronization tool. Since we use vcalendar and vcontact in out project internally we rely on means to convert to/from those formats. Until today we are using a improved libversit which is rather error prone espacially with vcal. We

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Status bar

2003-12-04 Thread Ettore Perazzoli
On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 06:59, ERDI Gergo wrote: On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Ettore Perazzoli wrote: I'll do this and then modify em-folder-view to use the BonoboUI status mechanism when in a standalone message window, but e_activity_handler_* when embedded in the main Evolution shell. How does

[Evolution-hackers] Completion Folders

2003-12-04 Thread JP Rosevear
Since we've remove the default folder stuff for 2.0, how should we handle the list of completion folders? Should it be part of an address book config control? Or possibly per account in the mailer? -JP -- JP Rosevear [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ximian, Inc. ___

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Status bar

2003-12-04 Thread ERDI Gergo
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Ettore Perazzoli wrote: About the shell part: I think you want to actually hide the label (not sure if it makes a difference visually, but it might) and have two separate e_activity_handler_set_message() / e_activity_handler_unset_message() methods. OK. And set_message()

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Drag-n-drop task creation

2003-12-04 Thread Not Zed
yeah but then you need to explictly link in every component to every other component. a plugin system would mena you didn't. its a hell of a lot cleaner, and removes the need for tight coupling of the components. On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 22:36, Rodrigo Moya wrote: On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 01:38,

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Completion Folders

2003-12-04 Thread Not Zed
since its all handled by the selectnames thing, probably in addressbook? On Fri, 2003-12-05 at 07:43, JP Rosevear wrote: Since we've remove the default folder stuff for 2.0, how should we handle the list of completion folders? Should it be part of an address book config control? Or possibly

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Status bar

2003-12-04 Thread Not Zed
On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 22:59, ERDI Gergo wrote: On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Ettore Perazzoli wrote: I'll do this and then modify em-folder-view to use the BonoboUI status mechanism when in a standalone message window, but e_activity_handler_* when embedded in the main Evolution shell. How does

[Evolution-hackers] [Fwd: patch for bug 43550]

2003-12-04 Thread Ettore Perazzoli
Forwarding to evolution-hackers. -- Ettore ---BeginMessage--- Dear Ettore, For the life of me I couldn't enter anything into bugzilla. I resort to the manual method. Anyway, I found this possible patch on the web. Maybe you already know about it, but here goes anyway!

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Status bar

2003-12-04 Thread Ettore Perazzoli
On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 16:31, ERDI Gergo wrote: Also, ETaskBar already subclasses GtkHBox so you don't need the priv-hbox member. Just use ETaskBar directly like the original code did. Yeah but it's a much simpler change that way, because all the methods that iterate over the box's

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Completion Folders

2003-12-04 Thread Chris Toshok
The default folder stuff didn't really impact the list completion folders. Those were handled by a separate gconf setting. The default folder was only used by the select names stuff when you clicked on the buttons and brought up the dialog. The old completion code had a separate xml encoded