Hello there,
I have a problem with an html attachment.
I am not sure how to provide details (should I
just forward an email - it contains other peoples
details than just mine)
Here is the status of 1 email I am looking at:
Evolution 2.0.2:No sign of the attachment
Today at 16:54, JP Rosevear wrote:
Now that we've moved camel to e-d-s and it has translatable messages,
whats the best way to move the existing translations from evolution?
Depending on the number of messages, it might be better to leave it up
to translators (if it's a small number of
I spent the day learning my way (somewhat) around the Evolution menu code. I've almost finished implementing my context menus proposal. (http://primates.ximian.com/~glesage/wiki/doku.php?id=evolution:menus) Patch is attached to this message.
I have not yet implemented the context menu when
I've committed Japanese translation. Please let me know if something
wrong.
Thanks,
Satoru SATOH
JP Rosevear wrote:
Looking at:
http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6066
I think we haven't really let the translators know what to do here.
On Mon, 2005-01-10 at 16:39 +, William John Murray wrote:
[snip]
Thanks Jeff,
In the meantime I found a second example, this one hiding a
ps file and I have to go to Thunderbird to read it.
Firstly, this starts to sound like an 'ie'-'firefox' discussion:
Saying that
On Mon, 2005-01-10 at 15:44 +, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
On Mon, 2005-01-10 at 07:07, William John Murray wrote:
Hello there,
I have a problem with an html attachment.
I am not sure how to provide details (should I
just forward an email - it contains other peoples
On Mon, 2005-01-10 at 07:07, William John Murray wrote:
Hello there,
I have a problem with an html attachment.
I am not sure how to provide details (should I
just forward an email - it contains other peoples
details than just mine)
Here is the status of 1 email I am
Hmm, so would the first script update all the translations and new strings? Or does it do something less than that?
Michael
On Fri, 2004-12-17 at 17:58 +0100, Danilo egan wrote:
Today at 16:54, JP Rosevear wrote:
Now that we've moved camel to e-d-s and it has translatable messages,
Hi Michael,
Today at 1:08, Michael Zucchi wrote:
Hmm, so would the first script update all the translations and new
strings? Or does it do something less than that?
The following would *update* all existing translations in e-d-s with
Camel translations from Evolution:
cd ~/cvs/e-d-s/po
Today at 23:18, Christian Rose wrote:
Would there be *any* way to enable translation of the welcome mail from
a po file, i.e. some way to keep the welcome mail source strings in a
format that intltool can read, and from where translated mails can be
generated at build time?
That worries me
[snip
we have code that *tries* to display any attachment inside a
message/related that isn't used by the body, but I guess it got broken
(or for some reason doesn't work in this particular case?).
what I find hilarious is that this message was generated by an Outlook
client and OWA can't
tis 2004-12-14 klockan 10:16 -0500 skrev JP Rosevear:
Looking at:
http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6066
I think we haven't really let the translators know what to do here.
evolution/mail/default/C/ contains the default inbox for new installs.
Other locales can be added here, much
So, these changes would be for 2.4, right? Because what with testing, documenting, translating this is a pretty major change.
a.
On Mon, 2005-01-10 at 12:25 -0500, Benjamin Kahn wrote:
With Evolution 2.2 fast approaching with a new plugin architecture, I
(along with Rodney and a bunch
On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 16:29 +0100, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 15:13 +, Andrei Mikhailovsky wrote:
Hello.
I've tried to compile the cvs version of evolution-data-server, but
didn't succeed. Does anyone know how to fix this error:
gcc -g -O2 -Wall
On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 13:22 -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
[snip]
Yep, I see that in the code (IMAP_SMALL_BODY_SIZE). I guess I want to
know if my fix idea is worth pursuing. I'd hate to have set
CAMEL_IMAP_BRAINDAMAGED each time, but at least that's a viable
workaround for now.
*nod* -
On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 12:02 -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 17:52 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 04:26 -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
I've been mildly annoyed by a change I noticed after upgrading from Evo
2.0.2 to 2.0.3 for a while now. I finally
Ben -- Some feedback on the Edit Menu specifically. Between the last proposal and this one, I find the changes to the Edit Menu where editing vFolders and Filters are located a bit confusing. They seem are wedged between pilot settings (Sync) and Preferences. I suggest putting vFolders and
Well for what its worth, we're strictly displaying that message proprly to spec.
multipart/related you only show the last part you know how to, and it is supposed to reference the other parts (e.g. a html part with a link in it).
So the message is broken.
No use discussing it here anyway,
Aaron,
Actually, these changes are slated for the Evolution 2.2 release. With
the addition of the EPlugins in Evolution 2.2, the menus should be
regarded as part of the Evolution API. (The plugins will be changing
the menus and they will stop working if the menus are changed.) This
19 matches
Mail list logo
