Re: [Evolution-hackers] Since the change of menu structure

2005-07-18 Thread smurfd
Hmm ill grep for Folder in all the .plugin.in files in the evolution/plugins/ folder. Then see wich ones are working, IF there are some that uses this type.. Yeah, ill see how it works. It, as i said, compiled fine, and i know that it ran fine in the earlier version of the CVS code that i had.

Re: [Evolution-hackers] gnutls v1.2.x vs 1.0.xx

2005-07-18 Thread JP Rosevear
On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 22:37 +, smurfd wrote: Hey! So, a while ago, i started this thread : http://lists.ximian.com/pipermail/evolution-hackers/2005-June/005877.html and well, after a while (2 days ago) i switched back to gentoo. This time, doing a so called Stable install, keeping

Re: [Evolution-hackers] gnutls v1.2.x vs 1.0.xx

2005-07-18 Thread Rodney Dawes
On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 09:08 -0400, JP Rosevear wrote: On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 22:37 +, smurfd wrote: Sooo. this is just a theory so far, i mean, evolution uses mozillas libnss wich in turn might use gnutls. Im not sure, as i said, just a theory. libnss does not use gnutls. However,

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Bug 200821: We need a Notes component. - first implementation

2005-07-18 Thread Harish Krishnaswamy
I have attached the gal-related changes required for your patch to build with Evoution HEAD. It works fine after that - I have also started using the memos component . Also, please make the necessary changes for the code to align to code style guidelines (C++ style comments etc. to be