On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 15:32, Ettore Perazzoli wrote:
Yeah, easy. Although then we run the risk of people who aren't using
spam filters being duped by spam adding that header and saying it isn't
spam. So it would probably have to be an explicit option for
environments where the
On Sun, 2003-08-10 at 16:22, Christopher Ness wrote:
On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 17:48, Not Zed wrote:
On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 16:19, Ettore Perazzoli wrote:
* We give the user a way to say what happens to messages detected
as spam; i.e. whether they should stay in the folder, or
Il ven, 2003-08-08 alle 17:03, Dan Winship ha scritto:
On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 16:19, Ettore Perazzoli wrote:
* We put a button in the mail toolbar to mark a message as spam or
not spam. When a message gets marked by the user as spam or not
spam, Evolution sends it to
On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 16:19, Ettore Perazzoli wrote:
I think we need to have some built-in anti-spam functionality in Evo
2.0.
* Support black lists and white lists. (This could be optional.)
So we need to write a gui editor for a spamassisn config file and crap
like that ?
For the
