Hi Michael,
On Tue, 2002-05-14 at 01:26, Not Zed wrote:
They wont be able to do anythign about it anyway, so it doesn't matter.
If they care enough they can use gdb manually.
It's not possible to attach gdb to a process that lives for only a few
handfuls of milliseconds, and dies
I've no objection to creating a full-blown script language, or using an
existing extension language, but... Just hobbling a short list of
actions together, with no iteration or conditionals, which include the
ability to run external programs, piping or not piping the message
concerned,
Hello,
I want to use un CORBA's object to connect to the Calendar server, but i
don't know the adress of the CORBA's name service and the clendar's name
service.
Can you help me?
___
evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2002-05-14 at 18:11, Christophe Cubat wrote:
Hello,
I want to use un CORBA's object to connect to the Calendar server, but i
don't know the adress of the CORBA's name service and the clendar's name
service.
you should be using OAF for that, which looks for the component and
In trying to run configure on the new source for evolution-1.0.5, it
complains that it wants gal-0.19.2, even though the only versions
available are gal-0.19.1.
Will the newer version of gal be available soon?
Thanks,
- Jeff
___
In /usr/lib/evolution/camel-providers I've got:
1.0 1.0.0.99 1.1
Do I *need* all that if I'm using 1.1-dev?
--
Austin Gonyou
Systems Architect, CCNA
Coremetrics, Inc.
Phone: 512-698-7250
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One ought never to turn one's back on a threatened danger and
try to run away
On Tue, 2002-05-14 at 17:34, Connector, Ximian wrote:
In trying to run configure on the new source for evolution-1.0.5, it
complains that it wants gal-0.19.2, even though the only versions
available are gal-0.19.1.
Will the newer version of gal be available soon?
Ooops, sorry, my fault. I
I wanted to ask the list if they thought the following feature request,
for the 1.1 branch would be a good idea.
In 1.1 you can color messages based on an assigned *label*. I'm curious
to know, if the filters will already in the future support this piece,
but if not, then I'd ask that it
On Tue, 2002-05-14 at 17:34, Connector, Ximian wrote:
In trying to run configure on the new source for evolution-1.0.5, it
complains that it wants gal-0.19.2, even though the only versions
available are gal-0.19.1.
Will the newer version of gal be available soon?
gal-0.19.2 is available.
On Tue, 2002-05-14 at 17:39, Austin Gonyou wrote:
In /usr/lib/evolution/camel-providers I've got:
1.0 1.0.0.99 1.1
Do I *need* all that if I'm using 1.1-dev?
No, just 1.1 is fine.
-- Dan
___
evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(In case it makes any difference, my main platforms are RedHat 7.3 and
FreeBSD 4.5 with Evolution 1.0.3)
In Evolution's calendar's tools - calendar setting offers us
possibility to choose between 12/24h time format, but as far as I've
been able to figure out, thats the only place, where user
Thanks much.
On Tue, 2002-05-14 at 16:48, Dan Winship wrote:
On Tue, 2002-05-14 at 17:39, Austin Gonyou wrote:
In /usr/lib/evolution/camel-providers I've got:
1.0 1.0.0.99 1.1
Do I *need* all that if I'm using 1.1-dev?
No, just 1.1 is fine.
-- Dan
--
Austin Gonyou
Systems
On Wed, 2002-05-15 at 10:20, Juha Ylitalo wrote:
(In case it makes any difference, my main platforms are RedHat 7.3 and
FreeBSD 4.5 with Evolution 1.0.3)
In Evolution's calendar's tools - calendar setting offers us
possibility to choose between 12/24h time format, but as far as I've
been
Its upto the provider. IMAP does this.
On Wed, 2002-05-15 at 11:57, Shawn Walker wrote:
Is there a way to have the camel/evolution to call into the provider plugin to get a
attachment to download from the server instead of having the provider download all
the attachments in get_message()
Hrmm? I don't recall seeing in the IMAP provider code to only download the mime parts
until a user click on the icon in the message window to either save/view the
attachment. From what I could see is that when imap_get_message(), it downloads all
the mime parts and return them to camel.
So,
On Wed, 2002-05-15 at 05:11, ext Not Zed wrote:
On Wed, 2002-05-15 at 10:20, Juha Ylitalo wrote:
...
When one searches for use of strftime from evolution source files, it
seems that it would be relatively easy job to create patch that would
fix them for my personal taste, but its not real
Re-read the IMAP code. You'll find that it does NOT download all parts,
it gets a BODY (very similar to a BODYSTRUCTURE) and constructs empty
parts based on that. When the mailer requests the contents of a MIME
part, if that part's contents are 'offline' it goes out and fetches
them.
Please see
You obviously didn't look hard enough.
On Wed, 2002-05-15 at 13:52, Shawn Walker wrote:
Hrmm? I don't recall seeing in the IMAP provider code to only download the mime
parts until a user click on the icon in the message window to either save/view the
attachment. From what I could see is that
18 matches
Mail list logo