Re: [Evolution-hackers] gtkhtml - composer not starting ...

2002-05-14 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Michael, On Tue, 2002-05-14 at 01:26, Not Zed wrote: They wont be able to do anythign about it anyway, so it doesn't matter. If they care enough they can use gdb manually. It's not possible to attach gdb to a process that lives for only a few handfuls of milliseconds, and dies

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Re: Scripting in evolution (Andy Cedilnik)

2002-05-14 Thread Not Zed
I've no objection to creating a full-blown script language, or using an existing extension language, but... Just hobbling a short list of actions together, with no iteration or conditionals, which include the ability to run external programs, piping or not piping the message concerned,

[Evolution-hackers] Evolution with CORBA

2002-05-14 Thread Christophe Cubat
Hello, I want to use un CORBA's object to connect to the Calendar server, but i don't know the adress of the CORBA's name service and the clendar's name service. Can you help me? ___ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution with CORBA

2002-05-14 Thread Rodrigo Moya
On Tue, 2002-05-14 at 18:11, Christophe Cubat wrote: Hello, I want to use un CORBA's object to connect to the Calendar server, but i don't know the adress of the CORBA's name service and the clendar's name service. you should be using OAF for that, which looks for the component and

[Evolution-hackers] building evolution 1.0.5

2002-05-14 Thread Connector, Ximian
In trying to run configure on the new source for evolution-1.0.5, it complains that it wants gal-0.19.2, even though the only versions available are gal-0.19.1. Will the newer version of gal be available soon? Thanks, - Jeff ___

[Evolution-hackers] How many versions of camel-providers should I have?

2002-05-14 Thread Austin Gonyou
In /usr/lib/evolution/camel-providers I've got: 1.0 1.0.0.99 1.1 Do I *need* all that if I'm using 1.1-dev? -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] One ought never to turn one's back on a threatened danger and try to run away

Re: [Evolution-hackers] building evolution 1.0.5

2002-05-14 Thread Ettore Perazzoli
On Tue, 2002-05-14 at 17:34, Connector, Ximian wrote: In trying to run configure on the new source for evolution-1.0.5, it complains that it wants gal-0.19.2, even though the only versions available are gal-0.19.1. Will the newer version of gal be available soon? Ooops, sorry, my fault. I

[Evolution-hackers] Discussion about a feature request idea.

2002-05-14 Thread Austin Gonyou
I wanted to ask the list if they thought the following feature request, for the 1.1 branch would be a good idea. In 1.1 you can color messages based on an assigned *label*. I'm curious to know, if the filters will already in the future support this piece, but if not, then I'd ask that it

Re: [Evolution-hackers] building evolution 1.0.5

2002-05-14 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Tue, 2002-05-14 at 17:34, Connector, Ximian wrote: In trying to run configure on the new source for evolution-1.0.5, it complains that it wants gal-0.19.2, even though the only versions available are gal-0.19.1. Will the newer version of gal be available soon? gal-0.19.2 is available.

Re: [Evolution-hackers] How many versions of camel-providers shouldI have?

2002-05-14 Thread Dan Winship
On Tue, 2002-05-14 at 17:39, Austin Gonyou wrote: In /usr/lib/evolution/camel-providers I've got: 1.0 1.0.0.99 1.1 Do I *need* all that if I'm using 1.1-dev? No, just 1.1 is fine. -- Dan ___ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Evolution-hackers] 12/24h time format and various date formats in evolution...

2002-05-14 Thread Juha Ylitalo
(In case it makes any difference, my main platforms are RedHat 7.3 and FreeBSD 4.5 with Evolution 1.0.3) In Evolution's calendar's tools - calendar setting offers us possibility to choose between 12/24h time format, but as far as I've been able to figure out, thats the only place, where user

Re: [Evolution-hackers] How many versions of camel-providers should I have?

2002-05-14 Thread Austin Gonyou
Thanks much. On Tue, 2002-05-14 at 16:48, Dan Winship wrote: On Tue, 2002-05-14 at 17:39, Austin Gonyou wrote: In /usr/lib/evolution/camel-providers I've got: 1.0 1.0.0.99 1.1 Do I *need* all that if I'm using 1.1-dev? No, just 1.1 is fine. -- Dan -- Austin Gonyou Systems

Re: [Evolution-hackers] 12/24h time format and various date formatsin evolution...

2002-05-14 Thread Not Zed
On Wed, 2002-05-15 at 10:20, Juha Ylitalo wrote: (In case it makes any difference, my main platforms are RedHat 7.3 and FreeBSD 4.5 with Evolution 1.0.3) In Evolution's calendar's tools - calendar setting offers us possibility to choose between 12/24h time format, but as far as I've been

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Can Camel/Evo allow on demand downloads forattachments?

2002-05-14 Thread Not Zed
Its upto the provider. IMAP does this. On Wed, 2002-05-15 at 11:57, Shawn Walker wrote: Is there a way to have the camel/evolution to call into the provider plugin to get a attachment to download from the server instead of having the provider download all the attachments in get_message()

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Can Camel/Evo allow on demand downloads for attachments?

2002-05-14 Thread Shawn Walker
Hrmm? I don't recall seeing in the IMAP provider code to only download the mime parts until a user click on the icon in the message window to either save/view the attachment. From what I could see is that when imap_get_message(), it downloads all the mime parts and return them to camel. So,

Re: [Evolution-hackers] 12/24h time format and various date formatsin evolution...

2002-05-14 Thread Juha Ylitalo
On Wed, 2002-05-15 at 05:11, ext Not Zed wrote: On Wed, 2002-05-15 at 10:20, Juha Ylitalo wrote: ... When one searches for use of strftime from evolution source files, it seems that it would be relatively easy job to create patch that would fix them for my personal taste, but its not real

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Can Camel/Evo allow on demand downloads forattachments?

2002-05-14 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
Re-read the IMAP code. You'll find that it does NOT download all parts, it gets a BODY (very similar to a BODYSTRUCTURE) and constructs empty parts based on that. When the mailer requests the contents of a MIME part, if that part's contents are 'offline' it goes out and fetches them. Please see

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Can Camel/Evo allow on demand downloads forattachments?

2002-05-14 Thread Not Zed
You obviously didn't look hard enough. On Wed, 2002-05-15 at 13:52, Shawn Walker wrote: Hrmm? I don't recall seeing in the IMAP provider code to only download the mime parts until a user click on the icon in the message window to either save/view the attachment. From what I could see is that