On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 00:44, Hans Petter Jansson wrote:
The GAL patch is just two small leaks.
Looks good. Please commit. Are you reworking it for trunk too?
--
Mike Kestner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have a similar case in GTK 1.2's GtkInvisible widget, which refs and
sinks itself on creation - it's reported as a leak, although it's being
destroyed in Evo.
The code should be unreffing it, not destroying it. Destroy doesn't
explicitly unref the widget, it's just that normally destroying a
On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 08:35, Dan Winship wrote:
The code should be unreffing it, not destroying it. Destroy doesn't
explicitly unref the widget, it's just that normally destroying a widget
will cause its parent to unref it. Since the invisible doesn't have a
parent, it still has a refcount of
