Hi Mathew,
On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 17:06 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> Hi all, I've recently started maintaining Evolution for Red Hat.
>
> The source code is dated November 1995 and looks to be isolated to
> libical. It's basically a linked-list of void pointers, and I don't see
> anything use
On Sat, 2006-07-22 at 00:00 +0300, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> on 2006-07-12 klockan 19:13 +0200 skrev Philip Van Hoof:
> > It simply looks like Evolution developers didn't know where to stack all
> > these Evolution libraries. And thought .. oh, we already had this
> > "Evolution data server" thing ..
On Sat, 2006-07-22 at 12:04 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> I have customers and end-users that are building mobile devices that
> will *not* come with contactbook nor addressbook functionality. Why
> would I want to ship a libedataserver that contains 1.5 megs of
> functionality that my Camel isn'