On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 00:38 -0700, Sankar P wrote:
> If all you need is just a non-deleting draft, you can use "Edit as new
> message". I have felt that this shouldn't be restricted to Sent-items
> alone as we allow configurable sent-folders. IIRC, there is a bug for
> this as well.
>
> Srini: S
On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 13:32 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 00:38 -0700, Sankar P wrote:
> > If all you need is just a non-deleting draft, you can use "Edit as new
> > message". I have felt that this shouldn't be restricted to Sent-items
> > alone as we allow configurable se
On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 12:15 -0600, Matthew Martin wrote:
> On 2/16/07, Sankar P <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-01-26 at 16:59 -0600, Matthew Martin wrote:
> > > I'm working on templates for evolution. I need to know where to put all
> > > the UI items for templates. There would need to
Le mardi 23 janvier 2007 à 08:43 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit :
> Matthew,
>
> It is an exposed interface, that is lying around after the GtkPrint
> migration. It should be removed in the next few updates.
Well, this change is breaking API and ABI. It would be nice to change
gtkhtml major, si
Hi Frederic,
We did update the GtkHTML versions under the assumptions of API
extensions in 3.13.90. In 3.13.91 we have broken API/ABI and removed the
obsolete APIs but we havent bumped the versions accordingly. We will be
doing that in RC Monday.
Thanks for pointing it out to us :)
-Srini.
On
Le jeudi 22 février 2007 à 13:46 +, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit :
> Hi Frederic,
>
> We did update the GtkHTML versions under the assumptions of API
> extensions in 3.13.90. In 3.13.91 we have broken API/ABI and removed the
> obsolete APIs but we havent bumped the versions accordingly. We will b
Hi Philip,
I've not done any work on this recently, but I've not forgotten it; just
been busy with other things.
On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 05:44 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
[snip]
> If you want to implement a specialised version for "spool" folders, fill
> in the function pointer like this:
(in ca
On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 22:52 +, Seb James wrote:
> Hi Philip,
>
> I've not done any work on this recently, but I've not forgotten it; just
> been busy with other things.
>
> On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 05:44 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> [snip]
> > If you want to implement a specialised version fo
On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 00:51 +0100, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> while preparing ebuilds for gentoo gnome-experimental overlay, I came
> across a "fix" that was present since... who knows (years???).
>
> It's a simple call to intltoolize --force. What for ? To fix the sources
> rele
On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 00:58 +0100, guenther wrote:
[...]
> Cc'ing Harish (tarball pushing) and Srini (release announcements), since
> I don't know who exactly does the packaging.
I know I did, and according to my Sent mail folder I am not totally
nuts.
However, the post that reached this list got
10 matches
Mail list logo
