[Evolution-hackers] Removal of implementation details from public API, any breakages?

2007-05-20 Thread Ross Burton
Hi, Last week I committed a patch to libebook, and want to commit a patch to libecal[1], which removes private functions and types from the installed headers. This has several consequences: - e_cal_view_new() is removed - ECalListener is removed - ECalViewListener is removed I believe that nobo

[Evolution-hackers] Removing libical fork, moving to new upstream?

2007-05-20 Thread Ross Burton
Hi, I discovered last week that there is an attempt to resurrect libical from non-maintainership, merge all of the patches from various forks, and start making sane releases again[1]. Are the evolution team as whole interested in merging their changes to libical upstream and depending on it to be

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Removing libical fork, moving to new upstream?

2007-05-20 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Sun, 2007-05-20 at 15:03 +0100, Ross Burton wrote: > I'll happily start working on extracting the changes to EDS and pushing > them into the new libical repository, if the Evolution team as a whole > agrees that the fork of libical will be dropped. +1 Matthew Barnes __

[Evolution-hackers] gnome-pilot Calendar conduits and libecal

2007-05-20 Thread Nathan Owens
Over at bug 201167 (category syncing, http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201167), we're discussing where to put some new utility functions for the Calendar conduits (calendar, todo, and memos). In this instance, there are a few category-related functions that are common to the calendar, tod

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Proposed fix for bug 311512

2007-05-20 Thread Karl Relton
Hi friends I have submitted new patches to bugzilla for bug http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=311512 One changes e-d-s as Fejj suggested, the other does the Evolution side so it will only do mail-notification on 'truely' new messages. I'll be pleased if you could review. Karl On Thu

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Proposed fix for bug 311512

2007-05-20 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
Karl, This is a killer problem and you have been rocking with your patches on this right from the beginning. Awesome work! I'm sure that the Mailer hackers would review it asap and It will be great if we can get this in for 2.11.3. Thanks for your great work! -Srini. On Sun, 2007-05-20 at 19:2

[Evolution-hackers] Mail notification plugin names/descriptions

2007-05-20 Thread Karl Relton
Srini I was looking at your new mail-notification plugin in Evolution. All is fine, and I can see that you would want to 'add' the plugin rather than merge or replace the new-mail-notification plugin that already existed. However, I think the two should have their names & descriptions changed to

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Mail notification plugin names/descriptions

2007-05-20 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Sun, 2007-05-20 at 19:45 +0100, Karl Relton wrote: > Srini > > I was looking at your new mail-notification plugin in Evolution. > > All is fine, and I can see that you would want to 'add' the plugin > rather than merge or replace the new-mail-notification plugin that > already existed. > > Ho

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Removing libical fork, moving to new upstream?

2007-05-20 Thread JP Rosevear
On Sun, 2007-05-20 at 15:03 +0100, Ross Burton wrote: > Hi, > > I discovered last week that there is an attempt to resurrect libical > from non-maintainership, merge all of the patches from various forks, > and start making sane releases again[1]. Are the evolution team as > whole interested in m

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Removing libical fork, moving to new upstream?

2007-05-20 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Sun, 2007-05-20 at 21:49 +, JP Rosevear wrote: > On Sun, 2007-05-20 at 15:03 +0100, Ross Burton wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I discovered last week that there is an attempt to resurrect libical > > from non-maintainership, merge all of the patches from various forks, > > and start making sane rel

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Removal of implementation details from public API, any breakages?

2007-05-20 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
Ross, It will be great if you can mail the details on the address book stuff as well. I would like the libebook clients like OOo, etc to comment on this. -Srini. On Sun, 2007-05-20 at 11:29 +0100, Ross Burton wrote: > Hi, > > Last week I committed a patch to libebook, and want to commit a patc