On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 09:25 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 10:56 +0300, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
The best way is to ask for the ENVELOPE and the remaining info using the
normal BODY.PEEK method.
Have you actually ever tested this theory? or did you just pull this out
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 14:39 +0300, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 09:25 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 10:56 +0300, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
The best way is to ask for the ENVELOPE and the remaining info using the
normal BODY.PEEK method.
Have
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 09:48 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
I think the laptop problem is solved with the basic headers feature,
at least as far as collecting new summary info is concerned.
Syncing flags is another story, and where the real
slowness/user-frustration lies.
I'm sure David
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 12:23 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 09:25 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
it's not possible to do better w/o dropping features like message
threading.
In fact, the above minimalizing of header fetching already breaks the
quick context-menu vfolder
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 17:11 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 12:23 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 09:25 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
it's not possible to do better w/o dropping features like message
threading.
In fact, the above minimalizing
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 15:13 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 17:11 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 12:23 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 09:25 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
it's not possible to do better w/o dropping features like
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 18:27 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 15:13 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 17:11 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 12:23 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
.
All good points. I should explain I'm thinking of a mode
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 16:02 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 18:27 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 15:13 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 17:11 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 12:23 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
.
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 20:22 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
Why does it need to create a CamelFolder for the destination at all,
assuming I keep the focus on the source folder?
because you need both a source and a destination folder to move the
message(s) to?
kinda hard to move messages
