Re: [Evolution-hackers] SVN issues

2007-09-21 Thread Jules Colding
On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 15:43 -0400, Paul Smith wrote: Hi all; I'm not an evolution developer but I'm trying to understand the way the project uses subversion. I have some questions, especially now that there's been a release of 2.12: * Shouldn't there be a gnome-2-20 branch on

Re: [Evolution-hackers] SVN issues

2007-09-21 Thread Jules Colding
On Fri, 2007-09-21 at 13:10 +0530, Veerapuram Varadhan wrote: On Fri, 2007-09-21 at 09:18 +0200, Jules Colding wrote: On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 15:43 -0400, Paul Smith wrote: Hi all; I'm not an evolution developer but I'm trying to understand the way the project uses subversion. I

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Let's clean up dead files in Subversion trunk

2007-09-21 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
I probably wouldn't get rid of mail/README.async, that's useful knowledge in there iirc. Jeff On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 15:14 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: With GNOME 2.22 development just now getting under way, this seems like a good time for some fall cleaning. There's quite a few files still

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Let's clean up dead files in Subversion trunk

2007-09-21 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Fri, 2007-09-21 at 09:44 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: I probably wouldn't get rid of mail/README.async, that's useful knowledge in there iirc. Agreed. I'll mention that in the bug. There's some useful unshipped README files in Camel too, I believe. Matthew Barnes

Re: [Evolution-hackers] SVN issues

2007-09-21 Thread Jules Colding
On Fri, 2007-09-21 at 20:46 +0530, Veerapuram Varadhan wrote: On Fri, 2007-09-21 at 20:36 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: On Fri, 2007-09-21 at 09:18 +0200, Jules Colding wrote: On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 15:43 -0400, Paul Smith wrote: Hi all; I'm not an evolution developer but I'm