[Evolution-hackers] IMAP shared folders support

2007-10-03 Thread Thomas Cataldo
Hi, I was wondering if imap shared folders support in evolution was planned. It was working at some point when choosing imap IV server protocol, but it seems removed in recent versions. Regards, Thomas Cataldo. ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list

Re: [Evolution-hackers] New version of the Evo SVN Makefile

2007-10-03 Thread Jules Colding
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 18:42 -0400, Paul Smith wrote: Hi all; I just uploaded a new version of my Makefile to build Evo from SVN. This version allows for building the current SVN trunk HEAD (up until today I was building on the 2.20 branch). Really excellent I must say. Thanks, jules

Re: [Evolution-hackers] IMAP shared folders support

2007-10-03 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
Hello Thomas, We don't have any planned work towards imap shared folder support for the next cycle. We would be happy to take, if any patches are submitted for this. I assume imap IV is same as imap4rev1. This is deprecated during 2.8 cycle iirc. -Srini. On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 10:26 +0200,

[Evolution-hackers] Synching Evolution/GNOME version

2007-10-03 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
Hello everyone, There have been many requests regarding syncing the versions of Evolution (currently 2.12) and GNOME (2.20). I feel that it would be fine, if we just sync the minor versions. Evolution 2.22 GtkHTML 3.22 Evolution Data Server 1.22 Evolution Exchange 2.22 There won't be any

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Synching Evolution/GNOME version

2007-10-03 Thread Ross Burton
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 11:31 +, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: There have been many requests regarding syncing the versions of Evolution (currently 2.12) and GNOME (2.20). I feel that it would be fine, if we just sync the minor versions. Evolution 2.22 GtkHTML 3.22 Evolution Data Server

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Synching Evolution/GNOME version

2007-10-03 Thread Andre Klapper
Am Mittwoch, den 03.10.2007, 13:43 +0200 schrieb Jules Colding: Does it really matter? But, well, I doesn't care so please go ahead... it does. it's annoying that i have to remember which version corresponds to which gnome release for gtk+, glib, evofriends and other modules (i'm happy that atk,

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Synching Evolution/GNOME version

2007-10-03 Thread Jules Colding
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 14:17 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: Am Mittwoch, den 03.10.2007, 13:43 +0200 schrieb Jules Colding: Does it really matter? But, well, I doesn't care so please go ahead... it does. it's annoying that i have to remember which version corresponds to which gnome release for

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Synching Evolution/GNOME version

2007-10-03 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 11:31 +, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: There have been many requests regarding syncing the versions of Evolution (currently 2.12) and GNOME (2.20). I feel that it would be fine, if we just sync the minor versions. Evolution 2.22 GtkHTML 3.22 Evolution Data Server

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Synching Evolution/GNOME version

2007-10-03 Thread Paul Smith
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 14:17 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: it does. it's annoying that i have to remember which version corresponds to which gnome release for gtk+, glib, evofriends and other modules (i'm happy that atk, at-spi gail already switched to the gnome versioning a few months back),

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Synching Evolution/GNOME version

2007-10-03 Thread Daniel Gryniewicz
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 09:03 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 11:31 +, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: There have been many requests regarding syncing the versions of Evolution (currently 2.12) and GNOME (2.20). I feel that it would be fine, if we just sync the minor

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Synching Evolution/GNOME version

2007-10-03 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 12:53 +0100, Ross Burton wrote: On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 11:31 +, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: There have been many requests regarding syncing the versions of Evolution (currently 2.12) and GNOME (2.20). I feel that it would be fine, if we just sync the minor versions.

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Synching Evolution/GNOME version

2007-10-03 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 16:51 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: Applications that link to E-D-S would have to be recompiled obviously, but as long as they're using pkgconfig correctly they should not require any code changes (I think). I knew this claim would come back to bite me. The pkgconfig

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Synching Evolution/GNOME version

2007-10-03 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
Matthew, On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 16:51 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 12:53 +0100, Ross Burton wrote: On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 11:31 +, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: There have been many requests regarding syncing the versions of Evolution (currently 2.12) and GNOME (2.20).

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Synching Evolution/GNOME version

2007-10-03 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
Ross, Even I would have loved this if we can get all the friends to be 2.22. Unfortunately GtkHTML can't be 2.22 as it is already 3.xx. I felt that synchronizing the minor versions is fine. I'm not really against it, if there aren't any major objections to this. -Srini. On Wed, 2007-10-03 at