[Evolution-hackers] Fedora/ ZimbraEvolution: e-shell.h called by es-event.h, but not available with evolution-devel on

2007-11-29 Thread ritz
Hello I am currently trying to build ZimbraEvoltuion from http://zimbra.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/zimbra/trunk/ZimbraEvolution/ . Unfortunately, i am hitting a few bugs 1. Zimbra is hardcoded against Evolution 2.6/2.8, and not 2.12 ( hacked around ) 2. Zimbra has issues when using

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Fedora/ ZimbraEvolution: e-shell.h called by es-event.h, but not available with evolution-devel on

2007-11-29 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 01:21 +0530, ritz wrote: e-shell.h is included by es-event.h, but not available with evolution-devel on Fedora8.i386 Try applying the patch here: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=499920 I'm in the process of adding it to the Rawhide package now. I can also add

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Fedora/ ZimbraEvolution: e-shell.h called by es-event.h, but not available with evolution-devel on

2007-11-29 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 01:21 +0530, ritz wrote: I am currently trying to build ZimbraEvoltuion from http://zimbra.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/zimbra/trunk/ZimbraEvolution/ . Oh also, I learned that [1] is a more up-to-date repo. [1] https://zimbraevo.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/zimbraevo

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Fedora/ ZimbraEvolution: e-shell.h called by es-event.h, but not available with evolution-devel on

2007-11-29 Thread ritz
Hello On Thu, 2007-11-29 at 15:32 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote: On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 01:21 +0530, ritz wrote: I am currently trying to build ZimbraEvoltuion from http://zimbra.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/zimbra/trunk/ZimbraEvolution/ . Oh also, I learned that [1] is a more up-to-date

[Evolution-hackers] Is there a reason copy does't preserve mark for followup?

2007-11-29 Thread Ross Boylan
Using evolution 2.10 (but with 1.12 backend) on Debian I notice that when I copy a folder the flagged as important is preserved but the mark for followup is not. I'm guessing most other marks are not preserved either (though replied is preserved). The code seems to show a few state variables are

Re: [Evolution-hackers] HTML composer as a standalone program?

2007-11-29 Thread Zan Lynx
On Sun, 2007-11-25 at 13:22 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote: [cut] Evolution merely wraps GtkHTML's Bonobo-based HTML editor with additional buttons and menus that make it suitable as an email composer. There's a simple standalone test program in GtkHTML under components/html-editor/test_editor

Re: [Evolution-hackers] HTML composer as a standalone program?

2007-11-29 Thread Sankar P
On Thu, 2007-11-29 at 17:35 -0700, Zan Lynx wrote: On Sun, 2007-11-25 at 13:22 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote: [cut] Evolution merely wraps GtkHTML's Bonobo-based HTML editor with additional buttons and menus that make it suitable as an email composer. There's a simple standalone test