Re: [Evolution-hackers] Largefile support

2008-04-07 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 12:43 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:  The only 'gotcha' I can think of by enabling it by default is that it might break ABI if old builds were 32bit off_t's (the new off_t's would be 64bit). Oh, and fwiw, looking ahead, it may even be worth changing the public API to

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Largefile support

2008-04-07 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 13:29 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 12:43 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:  The only 'gotcha' I can think of by enabling it by default is that it might break ABI if old builds were 32bit off_t's (the new off_t's would be 64bit). Oh, and fwiw,

Re: [Evolution-hackers] cleaning up the timezone handling mess

2008-04-07 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Do, 2008-04-03 at 19:45 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: did the slightly inflammatory subject catch your attention? Hmm, it seems didn't, or the people who maintain the Evolution calendar are not reading this list/on vacation/busy. Should I rather lead this discussion in the bug tracker? -- Bye,

Re: [Evolution-hackers] SVN head build fails 'O_LARGEFILE' undeclared (first use in this function)

2008-04-07 Thread Reid Thompson
On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 15:13 -0400, Reid Thompson wrote: build error ccache gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../.. -I../../../../../evolution-data-server/camel/providers/local -I../../../../../evolution-data-server/camel -I../../../../../evolution-data-server/intl

Re: [Evolution-hackers] SVN head build fails 'O_LARGEFILE' undeclared (first use in this function)

2008-04-07 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 16:22 -0400, Reid Thompson wrote: explicitly passing --disable-largefile still yields an error... should be fixed in rev 8626 Jeff ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org

[Evolution-hackers] Evolution Exchange in Ubuntu Hardy

2008-04-07 Thread Paul Smith
Well, I've been very excited to see Ubuntu 8.04 (Hardy Heron) about to be released, because I've been so pleased with the current version of Evo and in particular, Evo Exchange and all the improvements in stability etc. that have been made over the last year or so. As you know I've been building

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Largefile support

2008-04-07 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 13:29 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 12:43 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:  The only 'gotcha' I can think of by enabling it by default is that it might break ABI if old builds were 32bit off_t's (the new off_t's would be 64bit). Oh, and fwiw,

Re: [Evolution-hackers] cleaning up the timezone handling mess

2008-04-07 Thread P Chenthill
On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 19:45 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: Hello, did the slightly inflammatory subject catch your attention? Good, please keep reading... ;-) Details can be found in multiple Bugzilla entries, the most important one apparently being this one:

Re: [Evolution-hackers] cleaning up the timezone handling mess

2008-04-07 Thread P Chenthill
On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 19:45 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: Hello, did the slightly inflammatory subject catch your attention? Good, please keep reading... ;-) Details can be found in multiple Bugzilla entries, the most important one apparently being this one: