Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution Exchange in Ubuntu Hardy

2008-04-08 Thread George Farris
On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 21:43 -0400, Michael B. Trausch wrote: On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 21:14 -0400, Paul Smith wrote: Unless something radical happens in the next few weeks to resolve all these problems, I regret to say that this Ubuntu Long-Term Support release will not be anywhere close to

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution Exchange in Ubuntu Hardy

2008-04-08 Thread Paul Smith
On Tue, 2008-04-08 at 08:08 -0700, George Farris wrote: I completely agree. I know of myself and at least two others running Hardy with Evolution Exchange backend and it is unusable because the exchange backend keeps dying. Are you on 32bit or 64bit systems? Do you have multiple CPUs? It

[Evolution-hackers] detecting new ical memory tracking

2008-04-08 Thread Patrick Ohly
Hello, I now have the situation that I feared in issue #516408: SyncEvolution trunk uses libical calls where the returned string must be freed when SyncEvolution runs with Evolution 2.22 and must not be freed when run with older Evolution releases. My plan still is to only provide only one binary

Re: [Evolution-hackers] detecting new ical memory tracking

2008-04-08 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Tue, 2008-04-08 at 21:42 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: Introducing the code rewrite suggested by Michael is impossible. Can I have the less intrusive patch included on trunk and the stable branch, please? Or is there some other version number which can be queried at runtime? I'd rather not

Re: [Evolution-hackers] cleaning up the timezone handling mess

2008-04-08 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Mo, 2008-04-07 at 23:40 -0600, P Chenthill wrote: On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 19:45 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: One could argue that the sending program is at fault: it could have used a different TZID after changing the timezone definition. Alternatively it could have sent a more complex

Re: [Evolution-hackers] detecting new ical memory tracking

2008-04-08 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Di, 2008-04-08 at 18:29 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: More broadly, we should add some versioning macros and symbols to libedataserver similar to [1], so Patrick could do something like: #if EDS_CHECK_VERSION(2,22,0) ... free libical strings ... #endif Would that address your

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution Exchange in Ubuntu Hardy

2008-04-08 Thread Paul Smith
On Tue, 2008-04-08 at 13:15 -0400, Paul Smith wrote: I can't figure out what's different about Hardy that's causing this problem. There was a major update to Hardy today that included all parts of Evolution, including e-d-s and evolution-exchange. The bugs listed there looked very serious:

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution Exchange in Ubuntu Hardy

2008-04-08 Thread HggdH
On Tue, 2008-04-08 at 20:54 -0400, Paul Smith wrote: There was a major update to Hardy today that included all parts of Evolution, including e-d-s and evolution-exchange. The bugs listed there looked very serious: freeing null pointers and other really unpleasant things. There haven't been

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution Exchange in Ubuntu Hardy

2008-04-08 Thread Paul Smith
On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 04:03 +0200, HggdH wrote: The fixes came from upstream indeed. They are fixes that were committed from about March 10th to April 7th (i.e., from the 2.22.00 release to 2.22.1). OK, gotcha. I incorrectly assumed that 2.22.1 was already in Hardy. I'll give it a good

[Evolution-hackers] Building Evo SVN on Ubuntu Hardy

2008-04-08 Thread HggdH
Hello, I used Paul Smith's Makefile ([1]) to build Evolution on Ubuntu Hardy (by the way, the easiest way to build evo from SVN I have seen so far...). The original Makefile does not address Hardy (stops at Gutsy), so I made a quick patch for it. I did not stop to check the prereqs, but Gutsy