[Evolution-hackers] camel_write's IO_TIMOUT, sounds strange to me

2008-05-21 Thread Philip Van Hoof
Hi there, It looks like for each write, Evolution just waits IO_TIMEOUT to decide whether or not it succeeded. IO_TIMEOUT is (60*4) (camel-file-utils.c) or specific per kind of CamelTcpStream (usually similar values seem to be used). Any transfer that takes more than four minutes seems to be

[Evolution-hackers] Running Evolution offline.....

2008-05-21 Thread svalbard colaco
Hi all; If i run ./evolution --offline ; i needed to Know what is the Macro or a variable that gets set to keep this offline state, when i run it...and in which file it gets stored?? As per my undersatnding evolution is by default run as online.so when i set the offline option and close the

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Running Evolution offline.....

2008-05-21 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 19:42 +0530, svalbard colaco wrote: If i run ./evolution --offline ; i needed to Know what is the Macro or a variable that gets set to keep this offline state, when i run it...and in which file it gets stored?? It's stored in GConf under

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Query

2008-05-21 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
Amit, Send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] He shares most of the NOSIP load now-a-days. -Srini. On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 18:20 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote: Hi Amit Forwarding your mail to the evo-hackers list, where you'll get a better answer cheers On Mon, 2008-05-19 at 15:53 +0530, amit

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Review a patch?

2008-05-21 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
Fudging the linked list in camel is a gross hack (made worse by the fact that the MIME specification does not dictate that the name param be last), this is why I suggested you do it in the composer by making it set the name parameter last when constructing the headers. Jeff On Wed, 2008-05-21 at