On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 18:35 +0100, Rob Bradford wrote:
Okay. Have you got these details? It would be good to see which of those
still apply, etc..
Sure - the original rational here (AFAIR) is quite simple.
If you share the same .evolution across multiple machines, and the
On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 09:00 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
Oh,
My earlier mail had that as a attachment :-)
Eeek. Not enough caffeine. ;-)
Cheerio,
Rob
___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 22:15 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
Rob,
IIRC, I had replied to Ross on a similar query, start GNOME 2.24. Still
OpenSUSE ships with in-built libdb. I'm not aware of any other distro.
JPR, who use to maintain Evolution few years back, gave me the notes on
why it
On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 14:22 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
What I'd love to see instead, is a one-shot migration to a simple plain
text, authoritative file with the contacts and then (perhaps) optionally
a binary cache I guess. But for the volume of data there, presumably
slurping it and
On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 14:22 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 18:35 +0100, Rob Bradford wrote:
Okay. Have you got these details? It would be good to see which of those
still apply, etc..
Sure - the original rational here (AFAIR) is quite simple.
If you share
Hi Rob,
On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 16:49 +0100, Rob Bradford wrote:
Hhh. But. The use case you outlined directly above about where this goes
wrong also applies here: Oh. You ran e-d-s on a machine with a version
that migrates it to Some Other Format (tm). You then add some contacts
which go into
