Re: [Evolution-hackers] [Evolution] Beagle and Tracker, letting Evolution feed those beasts RDF triples instead

2008-12-10 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Philip, On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 19:59 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote: > > http://live.gnome.org/Evolution/Metadata > > For early visitors of that page, refresh because I have added/changed > quite a lot of it already. Looks really good. The only thing that I don't quite understan

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [Evolution] Beagle and Tracker, letting Evolution feed those beasts RDF triples instead

2008-12-10 Thread Philip Van Hoof
On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 11:12 +, Michael Meeks wrote: > Hi Philip, > > On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 19:59 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote: > > > http://live.gnome.org/Evolution/Metadata > > > > For early visitors of that page, refresh because I have added/changed > > quite a lot of it already. > >

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [Evolution] Beagle and Tracker, letting Evolution feed those beasts RDF triples instead

2008-12-10 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Philip, On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 12:49 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote: > > What does the lifecycle for the data in that Unset store look like ? > > I think the LifeCycle is best described by this document: > > http://live.gnome.org/MetadataOnRemovableDevices > > It specifies a metadata cache fo