Re: [Evolution-hackers] A Camel API to get the filename of the cache, also a proposal to have one format to rule them all

2009-01-06 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: Hey Philip, [Im lagging in my mail-replies, still a lot to go, due to my 3 week vacation.] On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 13:25 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote: Hi there evos, For an EPlugin that I'm working on I will need a Camel API to get the filename of the cache.

Re: [Evolution-hackers] A Camel API to get the filename of the cache, also a proposal to have one format to rule them all

2009-01-06 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
Philip Van Hoof wrote: On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 08:25 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: migrating away from the IMAP specific data cache would be good. Yes. I think IMAP and the local providers are the only ones that are still using a specialized datacache. The IMAP4 one, for example,

Re: [Evolution-hackers] camel-folder-summary.c - 64bit-ness ...

2009-01-06 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
Michael Meeks wrote: Hi guys, I was just trying to reproduce some migration performance tests with my mbox and summary data rsync'd from a 32bit machine to a 64bit machine. Surprisingly this appears to crash immediately. that's not good :( Looking at the camel-file-utils.c

Re: [Evolution-hackers] A Camel API to get the filename of the cache, also a proposal to have one format to rule them all

2009-01-06 Thread Philip Van Hoof
On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 09:41 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: Philip Van Hoof wrote: On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 08:25 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: Maildir doesn't store individual MIME parts separately. So Mailbox is equally hard to handle for metadata engines as MBox is. Only difference