Hi Matthew,
On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 14:07 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> With work on Bonobo removal wrapping up, I've finally started taking a
> closer look at Camel (Evolution's mail storage and networking library)
Ah - another life-time of cleaning up, and polishing code: the goal
sounds
On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 10:36 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Hmm; you really propose to remove all threading from camel's
> implementation ? or just from it's API ? a full removal might be
> problematic.
There may be isolated cases internally to Camel where it can exploit
parallelism in CPU-int
Matthew Barnes wrote:
> With work on Bonobo removal wrapping up, I've finally started taking a
> closer look at Camel (Evolution's mail storage and networking library)
> and laying out plans for where I'd like it to go over the short and long
> term, with the ultimate goal of splitting it off as a
On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 14:21 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> The sqlite backend stuff could also use some work. As far as I'm
> aware, the tables are non-optimal.
I really think it would be worthwhile engaging someone who has "SQL
guru" on their resume and asking them for help on this. Maybe just
