Re: [Evolution-hackers] EWS: refresh your calendar cache

2011-03-02 Thread David Woodhouse
On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 08:11 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote: Also, I'd encourage developers to post the occasional status update to the list. Nothing formal, and at your own discretion. This is probably a good enough time for us to do that for evo-ews. If you clone the tree from

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Beware of GtkTreeRowReference

2011-03-02 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 15:19 +0100, Milan Crha wrote: Not enough, because the above. I'm doing this [1] (2.91.91+). Search for e_attachment_store_remove_all() calls (the patch fixes also placing of attachments to the correct bar). That works, I guess. In other places were I build a hash table

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Beware of GtkTreeRowReference

2011-03-02 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 09:36 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote: You might use something less aggressive, like iterator or path, for local indexes. Won't work in the general case. As soon as you insert or delete a row prior to the row you're tracking, GtkTreeIter and GtkTreePath are both