Hello!
I noticed that in 2.32/MeeGo, e_cal_new_system_calendar() always creates
a new calendar, although there is already one.
It is defined in gconf as:
The sequence of events is this:
1. e_cal_new_system_calendar()
2. e_cal_new_from_uri("local:system", ...
3. get source list
On Do, 2011-04-07 at 10:47 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I noticed that in 2.32/MeeGo, e_cal_new_system_calendar() always creates
> a new calendar, although there is already one.
>
> It is defined in gconf as:
>
> base_uri="local:" readonly="no"> uid="1300454894.7178.4@pohly-mobl1" na
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 16:31 +0530, Chenthill Palanisamy wrote:
> This would certainly help distributions which want to stay with
> Evolution 2.32 for a while.. My only concern here is, while
> cherry-picking patches how would we take care of the translations and
> documentation ? Are we adhering to
I have built some Fedora 14 packages of Evo 2.32.2 with the latest
additional fixes, for testing.
The main reason for doing this is to fix bug 646164 with modified
instances of recurring appointments, since that's really getting on our
tits as we implement that part of the Evolution-EWS back end.
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 10:47 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> The sequence of events is this:
> 1. e_cal_new_system_calendar()
> 2. e_cal_new_from_uri("local:system", ...
> 3. get source list
> 4. search_known_sources() by comparing e_source_peek_absolute_uri()
> against "lo
Hi David,
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 11:33:22AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> Once this passes muster, I'll push these patches (probably *without* the
> NTLM bits, if you're looking closely at what I included) to the
> gnome-2-32 branches and perhaps start doing a 'final call' for 2.32.3
> candidat
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 12:45 +0200, sean finney wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 11:33:22AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > Once this passes muster, I'll push these patches (probably *without* the
> > NTLM bits, if you're looking closely at what I included) to the
> > gnome-2-32 bra
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 06:40 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> The absolute URI for the "system" calendar is "local:system". There
> should be no slash. That's a bug.
Hi,
"was a bug" is more accurate, same as all (or most) things Patrick found
in his 2.32.2 (I hope it's .2). Check changes in
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 11:33 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> I have built some Fedora 14 packages of Evo 2.32.2 with the latest
> additional fixes, for testing.
Hi,
you may ask on user's list, this list is for developers.
> Once this passes muster, I'll push these patches (...) to the
> gn
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 15:01 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> "was a bug" is more accurate, same as all (or most) things Patrick found
> in his 2.32.2 (I hope it's .2). Check changes in e-source.c and related
> files in master git branch of evolution-data-server, you may find those
> fixes there.
Oh, go
10 matches
Mail list logo
