Re: [Evolution-hackers] [PATCH 1/2] e_cal_new_system_foo() should create corresponding source in GConf

2011-05-11 Thread David Woodhouse
On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 11:40 +0100, Dumez, Christophe wrote: > I have tested the patch but it does not seem to help. I don't know > what the reason is yet. I'm going to assume you're still happily working on this and don't need my assistance, until such time as you turn up on the #evolution IRC cha

Re: [Evolution-hackers] New 'eclient' branch in eds

2011-05-11 Thread Milan Crha
On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 07:24 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: > On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 06:59 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > > There was just a little problem with ECalView, which had 'client' > > property, which is referring to ECal, instead of ECalClient, and I was > > forced to "invent" different name for

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [PATCH 1/2] e_cal_new_system_foo() should create corresponding source in GConf

2011-05-11 Thread Christophe Dumez
Hi, No, I'm definitely not working on this (EDS), I thought you were :) I actually followed Patrick's advice and I executed Evolution once so that it created the system addressbook. This way I can work around the bug and keep on working on the QtContacts backend for EDS. I don't have time to loo